On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 08 08:38, Philip Lowman wrote:
> > Works for me. Puts files in the root of the "bar" project:
> >
> > PROJECT(foo)
> > SOURCE_GROUP("" FILES bar.h bar.cc)
> > ADD_EXECUTABLE(bar bar.h bar.cc)
>
> Ah, ok. What
From: "Robert Dailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ah, okay. If it manages synchronization between the CMakeLists.txt
files and
> the vcproj files I can understand the need for them. I guess I should
have
> first asked what they are for instead of immediately trying to get rid
of
> them :)
Oh darn, my lo
> Robert Dailey wrote:
> > The only trouble these projects are causing me is clutter. There is
no
> > functional purpose for them as far as I know, which is another
reason
> > why I do not like them.
>
> You could try this:
>
> set(CMAKE_SUPPRESS_REGENERATION TRUE)
>
> I think that will get rid
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Am Monday 24 November 2008 17:36:10 schrieb Bill Hoffman:
> > Robert Dailey wrote:
> > > You guys have managed to steal my thread and get completely off topic.
> > >
> > > Can anyone answer my original question please?
>
Am Monday 24 November 2008 17:36:10 schrieb Bill Hoffman:
> Robert Dailey wrote:
> > You guys have managed to steal my thread and get completely off topic.
> >
> > Can anyone answer my original question please?
>
> ZERO_CHECK is essential to the build working. ALL_BUILD is useful as
> it creates
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Robert Dailey wrote:
>
>
>> The only trouble these projects are causing me is clutter. There is no
>> functional purpose for them as far as I know, which is another reason why I
>> do not like them.
>>
> You could try this:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Bill Hoffman wrote:
>
>> Robert Dailey wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm pretty sure I can create a visual studio solution with a single
>>> project that builds exactly what I'm having CMake build for me. When I
>>> manually create this
Robert Dailey wrote:
The only trouble these projects are causing me is clutter. There is no
functional purpose for them as far as I know, which is another reason
why I do not like them.
You could try this:
set(CMAKE_SUPPRESS_REGENERATION TRUE)
I think that will get rid of ZERO_CHECK, but I
Bill Hoffman wrote:
Robert Dailey wrote:
I'm pretty sure I can create a visual studio solution with a single
project that builds exactly what I'm having CMake build for me. When I
manually create this visual studio solution I never create a
ZERO_CHECK project or an ALL_BUILD project and eve
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Robert Dailey wrote:
>
> You guys have managed to steal my thread and get completely off topic.
>>
>> Can anyone answer my original question please?
>>
>>
> ZERO_CHECK is essential to the build working. ALL_BUILD is usef
Robert Dailey wrote:
I'm pretty sure I can create a visual studio solution with a single
project that builds exactly what I'm having CMake build for me. When I
manually create this visual studio solution I never create a ZERO_CHECK
project or an ALL_BUILD project and everything works perfect
Robert Dailey wrote:
You guys have managed to steal my thread and get completely off topic.
Can anyone answer my original question please?
ZERO_CHECK is essential to the build working. ALL_BUILD is useful as
it creates the correct depend chain. There is no way to turn these off.
-Bil
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 08 08:38, Philip Lowman wrote:
> > Works for me. Puts files in the root of the "bar" project:
> >
> > PROJECT(foo)
> > SOURCE_GROUP("" FILES bar.h bar.cc)
> > ADD_EXECUTABLE(bar bar.h bar.cc)
>
> Ah, ok. What
On Mon, 24 Nov 08 08:38, Philip Lowman wrote:
> Works for me. Puts files in the root of the "bar" project:
>
> PROJECT(foo)
> SOURCE_GROUP("" FILES bar.h bar.cc)
> ADD_EXECUTABLE(bar bar.h bar.cc)
Ah, ok. What I am trying is more or less the following:
PROJECT(foo)
source_group("" REGULAR_EXPRE
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Nov 08 12:47, Philip Lowman wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> > > PS:
> > > What I'd reallylike to know is if it is possible to prevent the
> creation
> >
On Sat, 22 Nov 08 12:47, Philip Lowman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > PS:
> > What I'd reallylike to know is if it is possible to prevent the creation
> > of the Source/Header folders. With source groups it is just possible to put
> > files i
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Armin Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> PS:
> What I'd reallylike to know is if it is possible to prevent the creation
> of the Source/Header folders. With source groups it is just possible to put
> files in a subdirectory, but I want some files directly in the pr
On Fri, 21 Nov 08 23:44, Robert Dailey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a purpose for these 2 projects? They are generated when I run:
>
> cmake -G "Visual Studio 9 2008"
ZERO_CHECK will rerun cmake. You can/should execute this after changing
something on your CMake files.
ALL_BUILD is simply a target
Hi,
Is there a purpose for these 2 projects? They are generated when I run:
cmake -G "Visual Studio 9 2008"
Is there a way to prevent CMake from generating these 2 projects? I really
don't need them.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cm
19 matches
Mail list logo
