[CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-20 Thread Florian Reinhard
Hi, in 2.8.4 i added these lines to my project and had .asm files compiled correctly: ...set C/CXX compiler and how they are called... ENABLE_LANGUAGE(ASM) SET (CMAKE_ASM_COMPILE_OBJECT " -fr= -eo=.asm.obj ") PROJECT (myproject) ...add soruces, libraries and executables etc... with 2.8.5 i g

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-20 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 20 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: > Hi, > > in 2.8.4 i added these lines to my project and had .asm files compiled > correctly: > > ...set C/CXX compiler and how they are called... > ENABLE_LANGUAGE(ASM) > SET (CMAKE_ASM_COMPILE_OBJECT " -fr= > -eo=.asm.obj ") > > PROJECT (myp

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-21 Thread Florian Reinhard
Hi Alex, Thank you for the quick response, 2011/7/20 Alexander Neundorf : > Damn, I was so sure I updated the wiki, but apparently I didn't. > So here are the old docs, but this changed quite a bit for 2.8.5: > http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/CMake/Assembler > > What it does now: > the language "ASM" is

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-21 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi Florian, On Thursday 21 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thank you for the quick response, Can you please create a ticket in the cmake bug tracker at http://public.kitware.com/Bug and put all the information there ? I'll assign it to me, and we should get it working. > 2011

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-22 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 21 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thank you for the quick response, > > 2011/7/20 Alexander Neundorf : > > Damn, I was so sure I updated the wiki, but apparently I didn't. > > So here are the old docs, but this changed quite a bit for 2.8.5: > > http://www.vtk.org/W

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-22 Thread Johan Björk
Alex, I'm trying to conditionally enable ASM support for my compilers that support it (I have a project that gets crosscompiled to a whole slew of architectures). In an ideal situation, I would use ENABLE_LANGUAGE(ASM OPTIONAL) and check the flag if it works or not. For a few of the compilers, I

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-23 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday 22 July 2011, Johan Björk wrote: > Alex, > > I'm trying to conditionally enable ASM support for my compilers that > support it (I have a project that gets crosscompiled to a whole slew > of architectures). > > In an ideal situation, I would use > ENABLE_LANGUAGE(ASM OPTIONAL) and check

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday 29 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: > Yay! Native support for cl6x TI compiler! :) > > 2011/7/22 Alexander Neundorf : > > Can you build cmake from this branch I just created ? > > http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/TI_DSP_ > > Compiler > > Tested and fai

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-08-01 Thread Florian Reinhard
2011/7/29 Alexander Neundorf : > On Friday 29 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: >> 2011/7/22 Alexander Neundorf : >> > Can you build cmake from this branch I just created ? >> > http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/TI_DSP_ >> > Compiler >> >> Tested and failed: >> #cma

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-08-01 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 01 August 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: > 2011/7/29 Alexander Neundorf : > > On Friday 29 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: > >> 2011/7/22 Alexander Neundorf : > >> > Can you build cmake from this branch I just created ? > >> > http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-08-08 Thread Florian Reinhard
2011/8/1 Alexander Neundorf : >> I attached the gdb output i got. I've been running gdb from a minGW32 >> installation on a normal windows cmd.exe on windows7 x64. >> Unfortunately there's no backtrace (or i'm just don't know gdb well >> enough) and as soon as i execute "strace" after the cmake cra

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-08-16 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 08 August 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: > 2011/8/1 Alexander Neundorf : > >> I attached the gdb output i got. I've been running gdb from a minGW32 > >> installation on a normal windows cmd.exe on windows7 x64. > >> Unfortunately there's no backtrace (or i'm just don't know gdb well > >> e