Hi,
There's been some discussion on http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11126
and I raised the issue about the BundleUtilities port to Windows/Linux: the
naming is so bad as to make this (pretty cool) feature completely
undiscoverable.
I assumed, as I'd think others would, that this
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Mike McQuaid m...@mikemcquaid.com wrote:
Hi,
There's been some discussion on
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11126 and I raised the issue
about the BundleUtilities port to Windows/Linux: the naming is so bad as to
make this (pretty cool) feature
On 20 Aug 2010, at 13:09, David Cole wrote:
Sorry about that. The name was chosen when the functionality was Mac-only,
then we extended it to cover Windows/Linux. What name would you suggest as
more discoverable or better?
I'd go for InstallPrerequisites personally, it seems to fit in with
2010/8/20 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Mike McQuaid m...@mikemcquaid.com wrote:
Hi,
There's been some discussion on
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11126 and I raised the issue about
the BundleUtilities port to Windows/Linux: the naming is so
2010/8/20 Mike McQuaid m...@mikemcquaid.com:
On 20 Aug 2010, at 13:09, David Cole wrote:
Not a big fan of this one either. Personally, I think it's stupid even to
have differences between the build tree and the install tree. Now, with
this, you'd have differences between the make install
On 20. Aug, 2010, at 14:42 , Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/20 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Mike McQuaid m...@mikemcquaid.com wrote:
Hi,
There's been some discussion on
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11126 and I raised the issue about
the
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Mike McQuaid m...@mikemcquaid.com wrote:
On 20 Aug 2010, at 13:09, David Cole wrote:
Sorry about that. The name was chosen when the functionality was
Mac-only, then we extended it to cover Windows/Linux. What name would you
suggest as more discoverable or
