A while ago I started looking at using CMake to build OCaml projects. As part
of that I put together some useful (but maybe not very beautiful) macros.
They are available on github[1].
I've come to the conclusion that while CMake is a rather good build tool, it
isn't very well designed to add ful
2010/8/25 Magnus Therning :
> A while ago I started looking at using CMake to build OCaml projects. As part
> of that I put together some useful (but maybe not very beautiful) macros.
> They are available on github[1].
>
> I've come to the conclusion that while CMake is a rather good build tool, i
On 2010-08-25 16:32+0100 Magnus Therning wrote:
I've come to the conclusion that while CMake is a rather good build tool, it
isn't very well designed to add full support for slightly esoteric languages
and tool chains like OCaml.
I generally agree with that conclusion concerning CMake official
On 2010-08-25 17:50+0200 Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/25 Magnus Therning :
A while ago I started looking at using CMake to build OCaml projects. As part
of that I put together some useful (but maybe not very beautiful) macros.
They are available on github[1].
I've come to the conclusion that wh
2010/8/25 Alan W. Irwin :
> On 2010-08-25 17:50+0200 Eric Noulard wrote:
>
>> 2010/8/25 Magnus Therning :
>>>
>>> A while ago I started looking at using CMake to build OCaml projects. As
>>> part
>>> of that I put together some useful (but maybe not very beautiful) macros.
>>> They are available o
Hi Eric:
On 2010-08-25 22:20+0200 Eric Noulard wrote:
[...]My ideas was that some languages:
- OCaml (ocamlbuild)
- ADA (gnatmake)
- may Java too (ant/maven)
have already very efficient build tool with some history of usage too.
I don't know many Java developers who speaks "mak
