Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Bill Hoffman
> wrote:
>> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
>> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
>>
>
> There is still one compilation issue with xlC on Linux:
On 29.09.09 21:20:02, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf
> wrote:
>
> > I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between
> > source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. In both cases, if
> > it's broken, the package
Matt Williams wrote:
However, (I'm no expert, but) I can't think of a time where you could
break source compatibility while keeping binary compatibility.
- Remove the default value on a parameter
- Change the visibility of a member
- Remove an inlined function
...and I doubt that's a complete
2009/9/29 Alexander Neundorf :
> On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf
>>
>> wrote:
>> > I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between
>> > source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. I
On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf
>
> wrote:
> > I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between
> > source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. In both cases, if
> > it's broken, the
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
> I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between
> source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. In both cases, if
> it's broken, the package will not compile.
Do we promise source compatibility for C+
On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 29.09.09 19:24:54, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
...
> > Doesn't that imply that we will always need the 2.4.x behaviour for all
> > of KDE 4.x ?
> > I mean, if I set some property to NEW, which may change some behaviour,
> > the developer may h
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/25/2009 02:07 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
When building for Fedora:
98:
98: Total Test time (real) = 0.05 sec
98: Add
On 09/25/2009 02:07 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
When building for Fedora:
98:
98: Total Test time (real) = 0.05 sec
98: Add file:
/builddir/build/BUI
On 29.09.09 19:24:54, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > David Cole wrote:
> > > Thanks for the info, I'll fix the project later. I believe however
> > > that I
> > > didn't see any warnings, which should now be posted if I understood
> > >
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
>
There is still one compilation issue with xlC on Linux:
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuil
> > - New External Project Module. The 'ExternalProject_Add' function
> > creates a custom target to drive download, update/patch, configure,
> > build, install and test steps of an external project.
> Really interested in trying this new feature: Any example project available?
> Is it intende
Hi Brad,
Brad King wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for trying the release candidate. It is helpful to get feedback
> early in the release process.
>
> Martin Apel wrote:
>
>> However I found a few quirks in the first rc:
>> 1. I have quite a lot of Fortran files in one of our projects. We use
>
On 29.09.09 09:26:30, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 28.09.09 16:08:22, Brad King wrote:
> > Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > >> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> > >> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cm
David Cole wrote:
Thanks for the info, I'll fix the project later. I believe however
that I
didn't see any warnings, which should now be posted if I understood
correctly? Or is that part of the OLD behaviour still working?
If you set the policty to OLD, you should just get the
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 28.09.09 16:08:22, Brad King wrote:
> > Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > >> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage!
> You
> > >> can find the source and binaries here
On 28.09.09 16:08:22, Brad King wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> >> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> >> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
> >>
> >> I am sure I am leaving s
Bill Hoffman wrote:
I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
-
- New External Project Module. The 'ExternalProject_Add' function
creates a custom target to drive download, update/patc
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
>> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
>>
>> I am sure I am leaving something out, but here is the list of changes
>> th
Hi Martin,
Thanks for trying the release candidate. It is helpful to get feedback
early in the release process.
Martin Apel wrote:
> However I found a few quirks in the first rc:
> 1. I have quite a lot of Fortran files in one of our projects. We use
> the Intel Fortran 11 compiler to compile th
On 28.09.09 09:01:07, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> >>I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> >>can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
> >>
> >>I am sure I am leaving so
Hi all,
thanks for your efforts to improve CMake. Especially the support to run
tests in parallel is really great!
However I found a few quirks in the first rc:
1. I have quite a lot of Fortran files in one of our projects. We use
the Intel Fortran 11 compiler to compile these.
When gathering
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote:
I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
I am sure I am leaving something out, but here is the list of changes
that I came up
Clinton Stimpson wrote:
Where can I find more info on
- Fortran/C mixed language projects made much easier. CMake now
automatically can compute the run time libraries for a compiler.
Does that mean there is a variable I can use instead of manually specifying
libgfortran, libg2c and others
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 28.09.09 00:05:35, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Bill Hoffman
> wrote:
> > > I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> > > can find the source and binaries here:
> http
On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
>
> I am sure I am leaving something out, but here is the list of changes
> that I came up with. (If you n
On 28.09.09 00:05:35, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Bill Hoffman
> wrote:
> > I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> > can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
> >
> > I am sure I am leaving someth
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
>
> I am sure I am leaving something out, but here is the list of changes
> that I came up with
Bill Hoffman wrote:
- Qt based GUI cmake-gui is now the default GUI, MFC CMakeSetup is no
longer included in CMake. ccmake is still supported.
If MFC is no longer used then the following files should not be part
of the installer:
Microsoft.VC90.MFCLOC.manifest
Microsoft.VC90.MFC.manifest
mf
On 26.09.2009, at 19:33, Eric Noulard wrote:
2009/9/26 Michael Wild :
Usually I use
cvs update -dARP
which IMHO should probably be the default, because that's what
people (i.e.
me) expect from an update.
-dRP are ok even if I think R is not needed, however you usually don't
want A unles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
and what about clearcase snapshot views updating ? Any plans ?
Wojciech
Michael Wild pisze:
> Usually I use
>
> cvs update -dARP
>
> which IMHO should probably be the default, because that's what people
> (i.e. me) expect from an update.
>
> Are the
On Saturday 26 September 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> > can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
> >
> > I am sure I am leaving something out, bu
Usually I use
cvs update -dARP
which IMHO should probably be the default, because that's what people
(i.e. me) expect from an update.
Are there any plans for CMake (and other Kitware projects) to switch
over to a more contemporary VCS, such as git, hg or bzr (in the order
of my preferenc
2009/9/26 Alexander Neundorf :
> On Saturday 26 September 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>>
>> Not sure which one is newer, but I just cvs up'ed to the CMAKE-2-8
>> branch and tried to build and it failed with this:
>> [ 90%] Building CXX object
>> Source/CMakeFiles/CTestLib.dir/CTest/cmCTestUpdateCo
On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
>
> I am sure I am leaving something out, but here is the list of changes
> that I came up with. (If you n
2009/9/26 Michael Wild :
> Usually I use
>
> cvs update -dARP
>
> which IMHO should probably be the default, because that's what people (i.e.
> me) expect from an update.
-dRP are ok even if I think R is not needed, however you usually don't
want A unless you want to checkout cvs HEAD.
> Are ther
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Wow, this is really a surprise. I was not expecting CMake 2.8.0 until
> at least mid-2010! What's the expected release date for 2.8.0 final ?
>
As soon as the major issues with 2.8.0 rc's are worked out. Nothing
really sho
Where can I find more info on
- Fortran/C mixed language projects made much easier. CMake now
automatically can compute the run time libraries for a compiler.
Does that mean there is a variable I can use instead of manually specifying
libgfortran, libg2c and others depending on the compiler
I was too fast I forgot the list
2009/9/25 Bill Hoffman :
> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
Just built and tested on somes projects.
Awesome, works like a charm.
For those of you wh
Hello,
Wow, this is really a surprise. I was not expecting CMake 2.8.0 until
at least mid-2010! What's the expected release date for 2.8.0 final ?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
> can find the source
I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You
can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/.
I am sure I am leaving something out, but here is the list of changes
that I came up with. (If you notice something missing please let me
know and I wi
41 matches
Mail list logo
