Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

On Nov 28, 2007 12:56 AM, George Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe I am missing the obvious, but I am trying to understand -why- this list is talking about replacing the current CMake language. - better scoping - higher quality, outsourced documentation - outsource core language bugs -

Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

Brandon, On 11/28/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - better scoping - higher quality, outsourced documentation - outsource core language bugs - popularity boost for 5 years - some advanced programming constructs gained I certainly can't debate those (unless CMake developers

Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

On Nov 28, 2007 1:16 AM, Sebastien BARRE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11/28/2007 01:06 AM, Brandon Van Every wrote: On Nov 28, 2007 12:56 AM, George Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe I am missing the obvious, but I am trying to understand -why- this list is talking about replacing the

Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

Quoting Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Nov 28, 2007 1:16 AM, Sebastien BARRE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11/28/2007 01:06 AM, Brandon Van Every wrote: On Nov 28, 2007 12:56 AM, George Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe I am missing the obvious, but I am trying to understand

Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

there should be no difference whatsoever in CMake command, constant, and variable names. If I want to cut 'n' paste CMake script code to Lua code, or vice versa, I should be able to get away with the minimum of fiddling. In fact, the conventions should be so similar that a CMake script -- Lua converter

[CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

Just heading down this path as an experiment to get a better feel for it. Posted a snapshot of the source code on the Wiki http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Experiments_With_Lua The biggest issues I see are 1) keeping two languages around sounds like more work and who needs more work 2) variables

Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

, simpleWe.cpp } cm_add_library (simpleLib, STATIC, unpack(sources)); Would this be necessary / paradigmatic in Lua? In CMake I just use lists. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

Quoting Ken Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just heading down this path as an experiment to get a better feel for it. Posted a snapshot of the source code on the Wiki http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Experiments_With_Lua The biggest issues I see are 1) keeping two languages around sounds like more

<    1   2