On Thursday 23 December 2010, Mike McQuaid wrote:
...
Until then, at least the mailing list has a reasonable response rate and,
it seems, sufficient participation from knowledgeable folks willing to
pitch in and answer. So... if you're confused about something, please ask
here. We (I hope
On 22.12.10 23:24:35, Andreas Mohr wrote:
- there's no cmake -E rename available (perhaps for reasons of build rule
atomicity)
Hmm my cmake -E help tells me different:
...
rename oldname newname- rename a file or directory (on one volume)
...
This is cmake version
To start with, Charm might be a good example of how to use CPack, it's
an internal tool we've written in Qt and use CPack to do all the
packaging:
https://github.com/KDAB/Charm
Check particularly the CMakeLists.txt and Charm/CMakeLists.txt for all
the CPack-relevant logic.
On 22 December 2010
On 22 December 2010 22:24, Andreas Mohr a...@lisas.de wrote:
To put it simply, I was just not happy the entire time while
trying to implement this and not finding any satisfying (well-crafted)
solution,
only ugly, very bad or semi-failing workarounds.
That kind of work should be _fun_,
On 12/22/2010 11:24 PM, Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:15:07PM -0500, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote:
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:57:11 -0800
From: KC Jones kc.jo...@skype.net
Subject: [CMake] CPack 101
And I just don't seem to get it. I know this is very possible. I know
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM, KC Jones kc.jo...@skype.net wrote:
Feeling really uneasy about putting this out there, but here goes...
I have an app that I am building with cmake (2.8) on both Mac (10.6.40 and
Linux (Ubuntu 10.04).
The app depends on some libraries (Qt4.6 (no plugins) and
On 23 December 2010 12:43, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Neither do we:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10067
As always, as developers we find ourselves constantly working to improve
what we have: fixing bugs, implementing new features, answering questions on
the mailing
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM, KC Jones kc.jo...@skype.net wrote:
Feeling really uneasy about putting this out there, but here goes...
I have an app that I am building with cmake (2.8) on both Mac (10.6.40 and
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Mike McQuaid m...@mikemcquaid.com wrote:
On 23 December 2010 12:43, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Neither do we:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10067
As always, as developers we find ourselves constantly working to improve
what we
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Johan Björk p...@spotify.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM, KC Jones kc.jo...@skype.net wrote:
Feeling really uneasy about putting this out there, but here goes...
I have
On 23 December 2010 13:24, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
How do we make it very hard? What about KDE and Homebrew make this very
easy? Specifics, please.
Firstly, http://producingoss.com/ is a great read.
Specifically though, Homebrew is pretty much the golden child of
encouraging
On 12/23/2010 8:44 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote:
On 23 December 2010 13:24, David Coledavid.c...@kitware.com wrote:
How do we make it very hard? What about KDE and Homebrew make this very
easy? Specifics, please.
I think for you guys general guidelines on what patches would/wouldn't
be accepted
Hi Mike and all,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 21:58, Mike McQuaid m...@mikemcquaid.com wrote:
On 23 December 2010 12:43, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
I think the main problem is that you make it very hard for people to
contribute. KDE and Homebrew (two other open-source projects I've
On 12/23/2010 9:59 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote:
A few questions:
What platforms does it need to be tested on?
At least one. The important thing is that it actually has a test, that
will be run with make test on CMake after the code is merged into CMake.
The dashboards will take care of testing
Thanks for your comments and questions. May we quote you on that? (cmake is
elegant in the extreme ... great tool)
Of course. Since all the code I work with is published on multiple OSes, cmake
is a godsend. I'm actively working on replacing as much of our legacy build
methods with cmake
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:59 PM, KC Jones kc.jo...@skype.net wrote:
Thanks for your comments and questions. May we quote you on that? (cmake
is elegant in the extreme ... great tool)
Of course. Since all the code I work with is published on multiple OSes,
cmake is a godsend. I'm actively
On 23 December 2010 22:05, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Much easier on the eyes, much nicer in every respect except there's one
extra file in your source tree now. Small price to pay for readability and
future maintainability...
Agreed. I think what would be even nicer would be to
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:15:07PM -0500, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote:
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:57:11 -0800
From: KC Jones kc.jo...@skype.net
Subject: [CMake] CPack 101
And I just don't seem to get it. I know this is very possible. I know this
is my own problem, first and foremost. So
18 matches
Mail list logo
