There has since been a 1.0 release which seems to work very well.
ftp://ftp.qt.nokia.com/jom/jom.zip
___
Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
On Nov 1, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Verweij, Arjen wrote:
Benjamin,
If you haven't a
Benjamin,
>>
>> If you haven't already, you might want to take a lot at JOM, which is
>> essentially parallel nmake: http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/jom. JOM
>> is supported by CMake.
>
>Thank you Pedro. One of our developers already tried to plug jom into
>our current build system, but some troub
On 1. Nov, 2010, at 5:53 , Benjamin King wrote:
> Hi Karl!
>
>
>> I'm currently (as a consultant) converting ~2.5 Mio LOC C++/C from
>> vcproj/Makefiles/qmake to cmake.
>
> Can you say something of the motivations for your client to do this?
>
> I suspect that you are expected to keep most o
Hi Karl!
I'm currently (as a consultant) converting ~2.5 Mio LOC C++/C from
vcproj/Makefiles/qmake to cmake.
Can you say something of the motivations for your client to do this?
I suspect that you are expected to keep most of their development
workflow and processes in order. Which parts a
Hi Pedro!
Windows and nmake don't offer any feasible way to parallelize, so we are
stuck there.
If you haven't already, you might want to take a lot at JOM, which is
essentially parallel nmake: http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/jom. JOM
is supported by CMake.
Thank you Pedro. One of our develo
Hello Alex!
[Dependencies to generated files are] handled properly by cmake-generated
> makefiles and project files.
You use add_custom_command() to generate files, and if you really list all
files the custom command generates after the OUTPUT keyword, parallel builds
will work properly.
Gre
Am 30.10.2010 13:54, schrieb Benjamin King:
Hello,
I'm working on a ~1.5Mio LOC C++ project and our buildsystem is a hodgepodge of
handcrafted Makefiles, shell scripts and
qmake projects.
I tried to convert a subset to CMake and it looks very promising so far.
I'm currently (as a consultant)
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Benjamin King wrote:
> Hi Andreas!
>
>>> Our build is taking ages (almost a three hours on the fastest of our
>>> servers) and it would be really painful if everybody needed to rebuild
>>> everything for himself in the morning.
>>
>> 3 hours sounds quite excessive
On 2010-10-31 13:48+0100 Benjamin King wrote:
Hi Alan!
Our build is taking ages (almost a three hours on the fastest of our
servers) and it would be really painful if everybody needed to rebuild
everything for himself in the morning.
Aren't you distributing your source code with some tool t
On Sunday 31 October 2010, Benjamin King wrote:
> Hi Andreas!
>
> >> Our build is taking ages (almost a three hours on the fastest of our
> >> servers) and it would be really painful if everybody needed to rebuild
> >> everything for himself in the morning.
> >
> > 3 hours sounds quite excessively
Hi Alan!
Our build is taking ages (almost a three hours on the fastest of our
servers) and it would be really painful if everybody needed to
rebuild everything for himself in the morning.
Aren't you distributing your source code with some tool that preserves
the creation dates of source files
Hi Andreas!
Our build is taking ages (almost a three hours on the fastest of our
servers) and it would be really painful if everybody needed to rebuild
everything for himself in the morning.
3 hours sounds quite excessively long.
Yepp, that's too long, really. Thanks for your suggestions on cut
On 2010-10-30 13:54+0200 Benjamin King wrote:
Our build is taking ages (almost a three hours on the fastest of our servers)
and it would be really painful if everybody needed to rebuild everything for
himself in the morning.
Aren't you distributing your source code with some tool that preserv
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:00:03PM -0400, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:54:23 +0200
> From: Benjamin King
> Subject: [CMake] Converting a large C++-Project to CMake
> To: cmake@cmake.org
> Message-ID: <4ccc076f.6040...@web.de&
Hello,
I'm working on a ~1.5Mio LOC C++ project and our buildsystem is a
hodgepodge of handcrafted Makefiles, shell scripts and qmake projects.
I tried to convert a subset to CMake and it looks very promising so far.
One important part of our development workflow is this:
1) User 'nightly' bui
15 matches
Mail list logo