2007/8/31, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 31.08.07 13:19:51, Eric Noulard wrote:
> A program that uses libfoo doesn't
> need libfoo.so during runtime, only libfoo.so.X
Ok
>
> The development parts (headers and the .so link/file) usually come with
> a -dev or -devel package (libname-d
On 31.08.07 13:19:51, Eric Noulard wrote:
> I think Gonzalo is right the lib is misinstalled
> even some precompiled prog seems to use it with no trouble.
> I'll file a bug to the provider of the package.
Uhm, libraries in binary packages usually come without the stuff that is
needed to compile a
2007/8/31, Dizzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Friday 31 August 2007 11:44:11 Eric Noulard wrote:
> > I was trying to use (as usual)
> >
> > FIND_LIBRARY to find an installed library
> > the library is (Linux system)
> >
> > /usr/lib/libtoto.so.1
> > which is a symbolic link to
> > /usr/lib/libtoto.so.
On Friday 31 August 2007 11:44:11 Eric Noulard wrote:
> I was trying to use (as usual)
>
> FIND_LIBRARY to find an installed library
> the library is (Linux system)
>
> /usr/lib/libtoto.so.1
> which is a symbolic link to
> /usr/lib/libtoto.so.1.0.7
>
> The link /usr/lib/libtoto.so --> /usr/lib/libt
I was trying to use (as usual)
FIND_LIBRARY to find an installed library
the library is (Linux system)
/usr/lib/libtoto.so.1
which is a symbolic link to
/usr/lib/libtoto.so.1.0.7
The link /usr/lib/libtoto.so --> /usr/lib/libtoto.so.1
is missing.
Then FIND_LIBRARY does not find
/usr/lib/libtoto.
