On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 13:15 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
Resolved!
The solution was to set CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS using
-Wl,--as-needed.
CMakeLists.txt:
==
cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 2.6)
project(galinette)
set(GALINETTE_VERSION 1.1
On 2 October 2010 23:19, Andreas Pakulat ap...@gmx.de wrote:
[...]
Thats because a link-interface for an executable doesn't make the
slightest sense. The link-interface in cmake for a library target foo,
defines which libraries should automatically get into the linker-call
when linking some
Resolved!
The solution was to set CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS using -Wl,--as-needed.
CMakeLists.txt:
==
cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 2.6)
project(galinette)
set(GALINETTE_VERSION 1.1 CACHE STRING
Software version FORCE)
set(bindir
Am Sonntag 03 Oktober 2010, 14:15:41 schrieb Paul McEnery:
The solution was to set CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS using -Wl,--as-needed.
That is actually only a work-around. Pkg-config can handle the difference
between static linking and dynamic linking but you have to tell it what is
what. However,
No sure what happened to this message. I checked the list archive, and
only half of the message appeared
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-October/039975.html
On 1 October 2010 16:40, Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl wrote:
Hi Paul,
Probably one of the packages that you pull in --
Op zaterdag 02-10-2010 om 19:11 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Paul
McEnery:
No sure what happened to this message. I checked the list archive, and
only half of the message appeared
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-October/039975.html
On 1 October 2010 16:40, Marcel Loose
On 2 October 2010 21:49, Marcel (ASTRON) lo...@astron.nl wrote:
Op zaterdag 02-10-2010 om 19:11 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Paul
McEnery:
No sure what happened to this message. I checked the list archive, and
only half of the message appeared
On 02.10.10 23:00:57, Paul McEnery wrote:
On 2 October 2010 21:49, Marcel (ASTRON) lo...@astron.nl wrote:
Op zaterdag 02-10-2010 om 19:11 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Paul
McEnery:
No sure what happened to this message. I checked the list archive, and
only half of the message
