Von: Olaf van der Spek
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Alexander Neundorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
Why do you actually want to ship VS project files ?
To avoid a dependency on cmake. The library user probably doesn't have
cmake installed and it would be nice if he could
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Christian Ehrlicher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've the dependency on VisualStudio (and maybe other external libs) but
are afraid of the cmake dependency?
Yes, as cmake appears to be optional while the others are required.
That's a good point though.
Throw
2008/3/25, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Alexander Neundorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
Why do you actually want to ship VS project files ?
To avoid a dependency on cmake. The library user probably doesn't have
cmake installed and it
I cant help but comment that this is unnecessarily complicated when
all that is desired is simply compiling without the Cmake dependency.
Conceptually it should not be this hard.
Recently I was tasked to help develop a small static library (4 source
files), the primay developer works in Linux and
Hi,
This is a follow up to http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=6642
I'm developing on Windows using Visual Studio 8 and in my project I
use libraries like libogg, libvorbis, libpng, libbz2 and libz.
Some of those libs ship VS files, some don't. Some include VS6 files,
some VS7 or VS8.
Most
