> The code is in Source/cmDependsC.cxx.
> I think it's already quite optimized, but feel free to have a look at it :-)
Thanks, I'll have a look.
--
Best regards, Pavel
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://
On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Pavel Shevaev wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Neundorf
>
> wrote:
> > On Monday 11 January 2010, Pavel Shevaev wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Pavel Shevaev
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > Guys, what is the best way to to make the dependency sca
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
> On Monday 11 January 2010, Pavel Shevaev wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Pavel Shevaev
> wrote:
>> > Guys, what is the best way to to make the dependency scanner ignore some
>> > paths?
>
> how long does it take if you don't
On Monday 11 January 2010, Pavel Shevaev wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Pavel Shevaev
wrote:
> > Guys, what is the best way to to make the dependency scanner ignore some
> > paths?
how long does it take if you don't set include_regular_expression() ?
> Sorry folks, I'm replying to my
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Pavel Shevaev wrote:
> Guys, what is the best way to to make the dependency scanner ignore some
> paths?
Sorry folks, I'm replying to myself So, no advice here?
Let me rephrase the original question a bit then: what are the best
practices to speed up the CMa
Guys, what is the best way to to make the dependency scanner ignore some paths?
For example, I'm using boost in my project but I really don't want the
dependency scanner to take it into account since it changes rarely(or
never).
For some time I've been using the following trick:
include_regular_
