Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-04-04 Thread Fred Fred
a good path, so I tried to copy all the .h files in the Views directory into the GUISupport/Qt directory but as expected the compilation works but there are errors at the link stage. So which mistake did I do? Subject: Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support? From: them...@gmail.com Date

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-04-04 Thread John Drescher
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Fred Fred stan1...@hotmail.fr wrote: You are right! Actually I have been confusing with MinGW and Cygwin and I realized that I just need MinGW because I need to compile my plugins on Windows, and MinGW would allow me to generate native Windows dlls, whereas

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-04-04 Thread Fred Fred
-0400 Subject: Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support? From: dresche...@gmail.com To: stan1...@hotmail.fr CC: cmake@cmake.org On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Fred Fred stan1...@hotmail.fr wrote: You are right! Actually I have been confusing with MinGW and Cygwin and I realized

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-04-04 Thread John Drescher
Which one? I just found a single CMakeLists.txt file in the build hierarchy, actually located in ./VTK/CMakeTmp/TestExplicitInstantiation/CMakeLists.txt, but I suppose you speak about another one. Do you mean a CMakeLists.txt located in the source hierarchy??? From your answer it looks like

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-04-04 Thread Mike Jackson
support? From: them...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:03:38 +0200 CC: cmake@cmake.org To: stan1...@hotmail.fr On 29. Mar, 2010, at 9:51 , Fred Fred wrote: Subject: Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support? From: them...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:55:44 +0200 CC

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-04-04 Thread Mike Jackson
the compilation works but there are errors at the link stage. So which mistake did I do? Subject: Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support? From: them...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:03:38 +0200 CC: cmake@cmake.org To: stan1...@hotmail.fr On 29. Mar, 2010, at 9:51 , Fred Fred

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-04-04 Thread Fred Fred
Yes I am trying to build PV. Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:37:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support? From: dresche...@gmail.com To: stan1...@hotmail.fr CC: cmake@cmake.org Which one? I just found a single CMakeLists.txt file in the build hierarchy, actually

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-04-04 Thread Fred Fred
That's exactly what I did. From: mike.jack...@bluequartz.net Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 11:30:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support? To: stan1...@hotmail.fr CC: them...@gmail.com; cmake@cmake.org Did you build Qt prior to try to build vtk with qt support? You can download

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-04-04 Thread Fred Fred
? From: mike.jack...@bluequartz.net Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 11:32:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support? To: stan1...@hotmail.fr CC: them...@gmail.com; cmake@cmake.org Sorry sent too quick. So download Qt from Nokias web site, install that, then try building VTK with qt

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-03-29 Thread Michael Wild
On 28. Mar, 2010, at 18:09 , Fred Fred wrote: [snip] What I do not understand is why would cmake use non ASCII characters? Since my path is in ASCII (at least I hope that a mkdir command with non-accentuated characters does not generate non ASCII paths!) and I checked all the paths in

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-03-29 Thread Bill Hoffman
Michael Wild wrote: On 29. Mar, 2010, at 9:51 , Fred Fred wrote: Subject: Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support? From: them...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:55:44 +0200 CC: cmake@cmake.org To: stan1...@hotmail.fr On 28. Mar, 2010, at 18:09 , Fred Fred wrote: [snip] What I

[CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-03-28 Thread Fred Fred
This list seems not to be really active and I did not receive any help since I posted this one week ago. BTW this issue has been open on Mantis more than 3 months ago and seems still to be open! So is there really anybody trying to help on cmake?? From: stan1...@hotmail.fr To: cmake@cmake.org

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-03-28 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/3/28 Fred Fred stan1...@hotmail.fr: This list seems not to be really active You are kidding right? Did you check the past 3 years archive ? and I did not receive any help since I posted this one week ago. BTW this issue has been open on Mantis more than 3 months ago and seems still to

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-03-28 Thread Michael Wild
On 28. Mar, 2010, at 12:37 , Eric Noulard wrote: 2010/3/28 Fred Fred stan1...@hotmail.fr: This list seems not to be really active You are kidding right? Did you check the past 3 years archive ? Two years worth of messages in my mailbox: 16422... and I did not receive any help since I

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-03-28 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 28 March 2010, Eric Noulard wrote: 2010/3/28 Fred Fred stan1...@hotmail.fr: This list seems not to be really active You are kidding right? Did you check the past 3 years archive ? and I did not receive any help since I posted this one week ago. BTW this issue has been open on

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-03-28 Thread Oliver Smith
On 3/28/2010 5:14 AM, Fred Fred wrote: This list seems not to be really active and I did not receive any help since I posted this one week ago. BTW this issue has been open on Mantis more than 3 months ago and seems still to be open! So is there really anybody trying to help on cmake?? If the

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-03-28 Thread Fred Fred
Subject: Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support? From: them...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:10:17 +0200 CC: stan1...@hotmail.fr; cmake@cmake.org To: eric.noul...@gmail.com On 28. Mar, 2010, at 12:37 , Eric Noulard wrote: 2010/3/28 Fred Fred stan1...@hotmail.fr

Re: [CMake] Is there really any cmake support?

2010-03-28 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Sonntag 28 März 2010 13:10:17 schrieb Michael Wild: The easy fix? Only use ASCII characters in your path names... The real fix would be to port CMake to fully support UTF-16/32: a huge undertaking, with any software. Especially, since wchar_t is not guaranteed to be large enough to hold