[CMake] Issue with CMAKE 2.6 and Windows.

2008-05-20 Thread Phil Pellouchoud
I was wondering if anyone else saw this. I am running CMAKE 2.6 (just upgraded) on Windows XP and I ran cmake on my CMakeLists.txt files. I noticed that the TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES seems to add ".obj" instead of ".lib" to link libraries without an extension. I went back to 2.4 and everything

Re: [CMake] Issue with CMAKE 2.6 and Windows.

2008-05-21 Thread Brad King
Phil Pellouchoud wrote: > I noticed that the TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES seems to add ".obj" instead of > ".lib" to link libraries without an extension. I went back to 2.4 and > everything works fine... When it adds the .obj, obviously the build fails > because it can't find the .obj (it should be look

Re: [CMake] Issue with CMAKE 2.6 and Windows.

2008-05-21 Thread Arjen Markus
Brad King wrote: The difference in link line generation from CMake 2.4 is documented here: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_2.6_Notes#Link_Line_Generation This documentation is helpful, but it also mentions that there are side effects and these are not described (as far as I can tell) Reg

Re: [CMake] Issue with CMAKE 2.6 and Windows.

2008-05-21 Thread Brad King
Arjen Markus wrote: > Brad King wrote: > >> The difference in link line generation from CMake 2.4 is >> documented here: >> >> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_2.6_Notes#Link_Line_Generation >> > This documentation is helpful, but it also mentions that there are > side effects and these are not de

Re: [CMake] Issue with CMAKE 2.6 and Windows.

2008-05-21 Thread Arjen Markus
Brad King wrote: Arjen Markus wrote: Brad King wrote: The difference in link line generation from CMake 2.4 is documented here: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_2.6_Notes#Link_Line_Generation This documentation is helpful, but it also mentions that there are side effects and