On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> On 3/9/2012 12:21 PM, Steven Wilson wrote:
>>
>> Where does the Ninja generator currently live? Ie which branch in the
>> sources, etc? I am keen to see support for the Ninja generator on
>> Mac/Linux/Windows and would not mind working on
On 3/9/2012 12:21 PM, Steven Wilson wrote:
Where does the Ninja generator currently live? Ie which branch in the
sources, etc? I am keen to see support for the Ninja generator on
Mac/Linux/Windows and would not mind working on it.
Thanks,
Steve
The ninja support is in the next branch right
Where does the Ninja generator currently live? Ie which branch in the
sources, etc? I am keen to see support for the Ninja generator on
Mac/Linux/Windows and would not mind working on it.
Thanks,
Steve
2012/3/8 Peter Collingbourne
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 07:14:52AM +0100, Nicolas Desprès
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 07:14:52AM +0100, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
> >> > We *could*, if popular demand is high enough, merge it in anyway and
> >> > call it "experimental" to start with, or we could get it right all
> >> > the
> >>
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
>> > We *could*, if popular demand is high enough, merge it in anyway and
>> > call it "experimental" to start with, or we could get it right all
>> > the
>> > way before we merge to 'master' and put it out in an official CMake
>
>
> > We *could*, if popular demand is high enough, merge it in anyway and
> > call it "experimental" to start with, or we could get it right all
> the
> > way before we merge to 'master' and put it out in an official CMake
> > release.
>
What would be involved with fixing the rema
On Mar 6, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 06.03.12 18:47:05, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 07:09:03PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>>> On 06.03.12 17:10:41, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:41:19AM -0500, David Cole wrote:
> 2 t
On 06.03.12 18:47:05, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 07:09:03PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 06.03.12 17:10:41, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:41:19AM -0500, David Cole wrote:
> > > > 2 things I'd like to see before we merge:
> > > >
> > >
On 3/6/2012 1:47 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
Obviously things won't work perfectly (if at all) for things like GUI
applications or bundles. But there are a number of command line tools
(such as LLVM/Clang) which do not use any of the OS X packaging stuff.
I myself have used the generator to b
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 07:09:03PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 06.03.12 17:10:41, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:41:19AM -0500, David Cole wrote:
> > > 2 things I'd like to see before we merge:
> > >
> > > (1) test failures corrected on the Mac Nightly Expected da
On 06.03.12 17:10:41, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:41:19AM -0500, David Cole wrote:
> > 2 things I'd like to see before we merge:
> >
> > (1) test failures corrected on the Mac Nightly Expected dashboards
> > submitting using the ninja generator
> > (2) reliable dashboar
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:41:19AM -0500, David Cole wrote:
> 2 things I'd like to see before we merge:
>
> (1) test failures corrected on the Mac Nightly Expected dashboards
> submitting using the ninja generator
> (2) reliable dashboard submissions (even if not all tests pass) from a
> Windows m
On 3/6/2012 10:52 AM, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
+1 for publishing I think it will boost up the development, bringing
more people to work on it.
It would be nice to fix the stuff that we know about, as people will of
course start reporting bugs as soon as they find them. I guess as long
as we no
2012/3/6 David Cole :
> 2012/2/15 David Cole :
>> 2012/2/15 Nicolas Desprès
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Bill Hoffman
>>> wrote:
On 2/15/2012 11:04 AM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45:04AM -0500, Bill Hoffman wrote:
2012/2/15 David Cole :
> 2012/2/15 Nicolas Desprès
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Bill Hoffman
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/15/2012 11:04 AM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45:04AM -0500, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>>>
>>>
I note that Kitware has machines se
2012/2/15 Nicolas Desprès
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/2012 11:04 AM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45:04AM -0500, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>>>
>>
>> I note that Kitware has machines set up to run dashboards for the
>>> Makefil
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> On 2/15/2012 11:04 AM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45:04AM -0500, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>>
>
> I note that Kitware has machines set up to run dashboards for the
>> Makefile generator. Is there any reason why some
On 2/15/2012 11:04 AM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45:04AM -0500, Bill Hoffman wrote:
I note that Kitware has machines set up to run dashboards for the
Makefile generator. Is there any reason why some of those machines
can't be set up to run double duty as Ninja dash
On Wednesday 15 February 2012, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45:04AM -0500, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > On 2/15/2012 10:27 AM, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
> > =
> >
> >> I may have an Ubuntu box and maybe a OS X 10.7 machine, depending on
> >> what is required.
> >>
> >> What do
On 2/15/2012 11:03 AM, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
What's happens if it misses some day because the machine is not running
for any reason ? Weekend, maintenance, etc... ?
Not a bit deal, unless it is missing more often than not. I would say
95% up would be fine. If it is up and down all the ti
On 14 February 2012 22:00, David Cole wrote:
> Does anybody on this list have the capacity to volunteer to run /
> submit a CMake dashboard using the new experimental Ninja generator?
> (It's now a topic branch on our stage that has been merged to 'next'
> -- so it is included in the nightly binar
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> On 2/15/2012 10:27 AM, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
> =
>
>> I may have an Ubuntu box and maybe a OS X 10.7 machine, depending on
>> what is required.
>>
>> What do I have to setup?
>> Is the machine required to be up and running all the time?
>>
>>
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45:04AM -0500, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> On 2/15/2012 10:27 AM, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
> =
>> I may have an Ubuntu box and maybe a OS X 10.7 machine, depending on
>> what is required.
>>
>> What do I have to setup?
>> Is the machine required to be up and running all the time?
On 2/15/2012 10:27 AM, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
=
I may have an Ubuntu box and maybe a OS X 10.7 machine, depending on
what is required.
What do I have to setup?
Is the machine required to be up and running all the time?
Cheers,
It is required that the machine submit once a day. To submit it
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:00 PM, David Cole wrote:
> Does anybody on this list have the capacity to volunteer to run /
> submit a CMake dashboard using the new experimental Ninja generator?
> (It's now a topic branch on our stage that has been merged to 'next'
> -- so it is included in the night
Does anybody on this list have the capacity to volunteer to run /
submit a CMake dashboard using the new experimental Ninja generator?
(It's now a topic branch on our stage that has been merged to 'next'
-- so it is included in the nightly binaries available from
Kitware...)
Before we can merge it
26 matches
Mail list logo
