Re: [CMake] OSX Bundle Generator for Cpack

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Sean McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>One thing I would recommend, DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH should be considered >>harmful except for very specific uses. > > Benjamin is probably referring to: > That too, but...

Re: [CMake] OSX Bundle Generator for Cpack

On 6/6/08 12:49 PM, Benjamin Reed said: >One thing I would recommend, DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH should be considered >harmful except for very specific uses. Benjamin is probably referring to: --

Re: [CMake] OSX Bundle Generator for Cpack

On 6/6/08 10:49 AM, "Benjamin Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Shead, Timothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I started the new generator because I needed more control over the final >> output than current approaches provided. In particular, I needed to skip >> s

Re: [CMake] OSX Bundle Generator for Cpack

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Shead, Timothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/User:Tshead/OSX_CPack_Bundle_Generator Neat! > I started the new generator because I needed more control over the final > output than current approaches provided. In particular, I needed to sk

[CMake] OSX Bundle Generator for Cpack

Folks: I've just posted a patch that introduces a prototype OSX bundle generator here: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=7170 Along with a writeup in the wiki here: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/User:Tshead/OSX_CPack_Bundle_Generator I started the new generator because I needed more contr