On Monday 07 July 2008 22:04:53 Enrico Scholz wrote:
> "Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> writes:
> >>> I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
> >>> find_xxx commands that would treat as a non-cached variable.
> >>
> >> Better wolution would be the
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008, Timenkov Yuri wrote:
>> On Monday 07 July 2008 10:26:49 Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
>> > find_xxx commands that would
On Monday 07 July 2008, Timenkov Yuri wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 10:26:49 Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
> > find_xxx commands that would treat as a non-cached variable. I
> > have posted this as a feat
"Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Better wolution would be the equivalent of autoconf's './config.status
--recheck', e.g. reinvoking cmake with empty cache but with original
configuration options.
> ...
> Maybe I'm missing the point, so please explain how t
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> "Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva" writes:
I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
find_xxx commands that would treat as a non-cached variable.
>>>
>>> Better wolution would be the equivalent of autoconf's './c
"Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>>> I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
>>> find_xxx commands that would treat as a non-cached variable.
>>
>> Better wolution would be the equivalent of autoconf's './config.status
>> --recheck', e.g. reinv
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Enrico Scholz wrote:
>>>
>>> "Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva" writes:
I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
find_xxx commands th
Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Enrico Scholz wrote:
"Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva" writes:
I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
find_xxx commands that would treat as a non-cached variable.
Better wolution would be the equival
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> "Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva" writes:
>> I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
>> find_xxx commands that would treat as a non-cached variable.
>
> Better wolution would be the equivalent of autoconf's './config.st
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Timenkov Yuri wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 10:26:49 Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
>> find_xxx commands that would treat as a non-cached variable. I
>> have posted this as a f
On Monday 07 July 2008 10:26:49 Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
> find_xxx commands that would treat as a non-cached variable. I
> have posted this as a feature request with an initial patch
> implementing it for
"Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
> find_xxx commands that would treat as a non-cached variable.
Better wolution would be the equivalent of autoconf's './config.status
--recheck', e.g. reinvoking cmake
Hello,
I would like to propose the addition of a NO_CACHE keyword to the
find_xxx commands that would treat as a non-cached variable. I
have posted this as a feature request with an initial patch
implementing it for the find_path command. For more information look
at the feature request at:
http
13 matches
Mail list logo
