On 12/9/06, Axel Roebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tristan Carel wrote:
> Hi Swig lovers,
>
> Axel had the great idea to use the -swiglib option in order to improve
> the module's efficiency to properly fill the prerequesites variables.
> I guess it is the perfect example of using a tool to perf
On Monday 11 December 2006 21:52, Tristan Carel wrote:
> On 12/9/06, Axel Roebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tristan Carel wrote:
> > > Hi Swig lovers,
> > >
... cut
> > DEPENDS ${SWIG_MODULE_${name}_EXTRA_DEPS}
>
> Yes, It's exactly what I meant in my previous post when I wrote:
>
> "[...
I have some more observations :
1)
the error message SWIG_GET_WRAPPER_DEPENDENCIES
uses ${SWIG} instead of ${SWIG_EXECUTABLE}
MESSAGE(SEND_ERROR "Command \"${SWIG} -MM -MF ${swig_getdeps_depsfile}
${swig_getdeps_extra_flags} -${language} -o ${genWrapper} $\
{swig_getdeps_include_dirs} ${swigFil
On 12/12/06, Axel Roebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Axel,
I have some more observations :
1)
the error message SWIG_GET_WRAPPER_DEPENDENCIES
uses ${SWIG} instead of ${SWIG_EXECUTABLE}
You're completely right!
2)
The command line used to find the dependencies
does not use the same flags
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 16:36, Tristan Carel wrote:
> I added a RC3 version on the bt
> (http://www.cmake.org/Bug/bug.php?op=show&bugid=4147) which takes care
> of your comments. It should be all right now. Do you copy?
Not that it is extremely important, but the
error message still does not
On 12/12/06, Axel Roebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 16:36, Tristan Carel wrote:
> I added a RC3 version on the bt
> (http://www.cmake.org/Bug/bug.php?op=show&bugid=4147) which takes care
> of your comments. It should be all right now. Do you copy?
Not that it is extre
