On 8/11/07, Pau Garcia i Quiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyway, back to topic: is Kitware going to work on PCRE support in
> CMake? I will be quite busy for the next 2 months, but that's
> something I would definitely volunteer to if nobody is going to take it.
I'm not going to volunteer fo
Quoting Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Guys,
No need for terse words. I took it as a joke from the very beginning.
Thank you Alexander and Bill for standing up.
Anyway, back to topic: is Kitware going to work on PCRE support in
CMake? I will be quite busy for the next 2 months, but
On 8/10/07, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon Van Every wrote:
> >
> > I don't trust smileys, people may not notice them. The above was
> > clearly a joke, except for the shooting part.
> >
> > Let me state the matter seriously.
> >
> >
> Sure, it is a bad idea, and technically I a
Brandon Van Every wrote:
I don't trust smileys, people may not notice them. The above was
clearly a joke, except for the shooting part.
Let me state the matter seriously. Anyone who thinks that more
control characters should be inserted into a regex stream, that has no
wide based standard for
On 8/10/07, Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 10 August 2007 15:55, Brandon Van Every wrote:
> ...
> > Totally horrible brain dead idea. If it weren't for your other
> > suggestions, I'd say you should be shot.
> ...
> > You are a sick, depraved individual.
>
> Brandon, I t
On Friday 10 August 2007 15:55, Brandon Van Every wrote:
...
> Totally horrible brain dead idea. If it weren't for your other
> suggestions, I'd say you should be shot.
...
> You are a sick, depraved individual.
Brandon, I think this went to far, maybe even if there would have been
smileys.
Plea
On 8/10/07, Pau Garcia i Quiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> >>
> >> I took a quick look a few weeks ago and replacing the current regex
> >> library with PCRE seems "easy" (most of the work would be
> >> replacing the r
Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
Another option would be to have something like STRING(
POSIX_REGEX_MATCH ...), etc but I like the "~" better.
I think this would be my choice...
-Bill
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/li
Quoting Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
I took a quick look a few weeks ago and replacing the current regex
library with PCRE seems "easy" (most of the work would be
replacing the regexp's in current .cmake files with their POSIX
equivalents). Is Kitware o
Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
I took a quick look a few weeks ago and replacing the current regex
library with PCRE seems "easy" (most of the work would be replacing
the regexp's in current .cmake files with their POSIX equivalents). Is
Kitware or anyone else already working on that?
Sounds like
10 matches
Mail list logo
