On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 25/10/10 01:38, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 24/10/10 23:00, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
My best guess would be to check for some Clang-specific defines,
similar to the platform checks. Actually, it looks like in the Git
On Wednesday 27 October 2010, Campbell Barton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 25/10/10 01:38, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 24/10/10 23:00, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
My best guess would be to check for some Clang-specific defines,
similar to the
On 27. Oct, 2010, at 21:38 , Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Wednesday 27 October 2010, Campbell Barton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 25/10/10 01:38, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 24/10/10 23:00, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
My best guess would be to
On 25/10/10 01:38, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 24/10/10 23:00, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
My best guess would be to check for some Clang-specific defines,
similar to the platform checks. Actually, it looks like in the Git
repository of CMake, there is now some Clang-specific support:
On 24. Oct, 2010, at 17:33 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find out what's the status of clang support in CMake.
What version of CMake is recommended to make proper use of clang 2.8+
for building a C++ software, etc.
Feeding the favourite search engine with this:
clang
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24. Oct, 2010, at 17:33 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find out what's the status of clang support in CMake.
What version of CMake is recommended to make proper use of clang 2.8+
for building a C
On 24/10/10 20:07, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 24. Oct, 2010, at 17:33 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I'm trying to find out what's the status of clang support in
CMake. What version of CMake is recommended to make proper use of
clang 2.8
this helps!
Ryan
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 24/10/10 20:07, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 24. Oct, 2010, at 17:33 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I'm trying to find out what's the status of clang support
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:33:01 +0100, Mateusz Loskot said:
I'm trying to find out what's the status of clang support in CMake.
What version of CMake is recommended to make proper use of clang 2.8+
for building a C++ software, etc.
Somewhat off-topic, but if you're going to build C++ code
On 25/10/10 00:42, Sean McBride wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:33:01 +0100, Mateusz Loskot said:
I'm trying to find out what's the status of clang support in CMake.
What version of CMake is recommended to make proper use of clang 2.8+
for building a C++ software, etc.
Somewhat off-topic
On 24/10/10 23:00, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
My best guess would be to check for some Clang-specific defines,
similar to the platform checks. Actually, it looks like in the Git
repository of CMake, there is now some Clang-specific support:
11 matches
Mail list logo
