Re: [CMake] Support for languages without linking phase etc

2010-02-23 Thread Michael Wild
On 23. Feb, 2010, at 15:13 , Ivan Chernetsky wrote: > 2010/2/22 Michael Wild : >> How about languages where there is no separate compiling phase, such as e.g. >> C#? Is there a placeholder in CMAKE__LINK_EXECUTABLE and >> CMAKE__CREATE_SHARED_LIBRARY that gets expanded to the list of source >>

Re: [CMake] Support for languages without linking phase etc

2010-02-22 Thread Michael Wild
On 20. Feb, 2010, at 19:30 , David Cole wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Ivan Chernetsky > wrote: > >> Hi there! >> >> I've written almost all the .cmake files required to add Erlang >> support, but when I was approaching completion, I realized--to be >> honest, got confused by the fac

Re: [CMake] Support for languages without linking phase etc

2010-02-20 Thread David Cole
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Ivan Chernetsky wrote: > Hi there! > > I've written almost all the .cmake files required to add Erlang > support, but when I was approaching completion, I realized--to be > honest, got confused by the fact that there is no linking phase. So > here is the question:

[CMake] Support for languages without linking phase etc

2010-02-19 Thread Ivan Chernetsky
Hi there! I've written almost all the .cmake files required to add Erlang support, but when I was approaching completion, I realized--to be honest, got confused by the fact that there is no linking phase. So here is the question: what should CMAKE_Erlang_LINK_EXECUTABLE look like? Or speaking more