2014-06-12 12:18 GMT+02:00 Adam Strzelecki :
>> Because that would create an in-source build, and you almost never want that.
>> One wants to build out of source. Sadly CMake will stumble if you try to
>> create an out-of-source build from a directory that is an in-source build, so
>> not having th
> Because that would create an in-source build, and you almost never want that.
> One wants to build out of source. Sadly CMake will stumble if you try to
> create an out-of-source build from a directory that is an in-source build, so
> not having that default of "cmake ." actually saves everyon
Adam Strzelecki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We started using CMake recently in our projects. And it is really a
> timesaver comparing to Qmake/autotools, however there is one thing that
> bothers me.
>
> Why typing simple: cmake in command line doesn't trigger configure with
> default generator (i.e. Mak
On 11.06.2014 21:28, Adam Strzelecki wrote:
Hello,
We started using CMake recently in our projects. And it is really a timesaver
comparing to Qmake/autotools, however there is one thing that bothers me.
Why typing simple: cmake in command line doesn't trigger configure with default
generator
Hello,
We started using CMake recently in our projects. And it is really a timesaver
comparing to Qmake/autotools, however there is one thing that bothers me.
Why typing simple: cmake in command line doesn't trigger configure with default
generator (i.e. Makefile)? It just prints help, which is
