On Dec 18, 2007 4:08 PM, Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Missing:
> -ant: I think having an ant generator might be nice [...]
> It would also mean that CMake
> generates ("modern") XML files instead of ("old fashioned") Makefiles.
> -any others ?
If someone wants to do Ant, and
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Not supported:
Objective C - used on the Mac, would probably be good if it was supported
This actually is supported, although in a limited way. You can add a .m
file and cmake will build it on the Mac. Basically it depends on gcc
knowing what to do with a .m fi
Quoting Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Great summary, thanks.
+1 to a TODO in the wiki.
Hi,
there were a lot of emails, I'll try to make a summary.
So what is needed to get a big "market share" for cmake and what seems to be
required in cmake features.
This is not intended to be a ta
Hi,
there were a lot of emails, I'll try to make a summary.
So what is needed to get a big "market share" for cmake and what seems to be
required in cmake features.
This is not intended to be a task list for Kitware, e.g. ant and the support
for languages would be nice as contributions from some
