On 11/03/2010 10:36 PM, Szilárd Páll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, I'd be grateful for a reply to the 2nd of my question.
> Can anyone confirm that LINK_SEARCH_END_STATIC on Linux + gcc is
> buggy?
Indeed, I can confirm that enabling the LINK_SEARCH_END_STATIC target
property without further mea
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 17:57 +0100, Michael Hertling wrote:
> On 11/02/2010 10:54 PM, Szilárd Páll wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been trying to implement a feature which would enable building
> > static binaries with cmake, but I've got completely stuck, I hope
> > someone can hint me what's the best
Hi,
First of all, I'd be grateful for a reply to the 2nd of my question.
Can anyone confirm that LINK_SEARCH_END_STATIC on Linux + gcc is
buggy?
@Michael: Thanks for the link, I've actually seen that thread, but I
was quite disappointed by the conclusions so I asked with the hope
that the opinio
On 11/02/2010 10:54 PM, Szilárd Páll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to implement a feature which would enable building
> static binaries with cmake, but I've got completely stuck, I hope
> someone can hint me what's the best way to do this.
>
> What I've done is a 2 stage solution for making s
Hi,
I've been trying to implement a feature which would enable building
static binaries with cmake, but I've got completely stuck, I hope
someone can hint me what's the best way to do this.
What I've done is a 2 stage solution for making static binaries:
1) Telling cmake to prefer picking up ".a