-Original Message-
From: Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 December 2007 15:23
To: Josef Karthauser
Cc: CMake ML
Subject: Re: [CMake] Compilation speed with CMake/NMake combination,
making it faster?
[cut]
Don't forget about the fast targets, I make heavy use of them
Josef Karthauser wrote:
So we’ve got a fairly sizable amount of code described in the CMake
framework now, about 10 or so libraries, and 4 projects which consume
them. We’re now hitting upon compilation time as an issue, as it takes
much longer than our previous framework did. I’m wondering
Eric Noulard wrote:
2007/12/11, Jason Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is not scientific but I wrote a quick perl script to compile a
simple library that we use (GCTPc). It consists of 70 C files with most
of the files between 5K and 6K, a few are as large as 70K. The script
just uses the time()
2007/12/12, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Eric Noulard wrote:
I'm not a big MS Platform user but I like the idea
of compilation speed-up very much.
I personnally use ccache (http://ccache.samba.org/)
on Linux + gcc and there is x2 up to x4 _SPEEDUP_
(when recompiling since
* We're using an NMake build tree, is NMake particularly
slow? Do any of the other makes work more efficiently?
Be aware that nmake builds are much slower than using devenv, as nmake starts a
cl.exe process for every single file,
whereas devenv calls cl.exe with several source files.
-Original Message-
From: Torsten Martinsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 December 2007 09:08
To: Josef Karthauser; CMake ML
Subject: RE: [CMake] Compilation speed with CMake/NMake combination,
making it faster?
* We're using an NMake build tree, is NMake particularly
Von: Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Torsten Martinsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 December 2007 09:08
To: Josef Karthauser; CMake ML
Subject: RE: [CMake] Compilation speed with CMake/NMake combination,
making it faster?
* We're
Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
* We're using an NMake build tree, is NMake particularly
slow? Do any of the other makes work more efficiently?
Be aware that nmake builds are much slower than using devenv, as nmake
starts a cl.exe process for every single file,
whereas devenv calls
Bill Hoffman wrote:
Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
* We're using an NMake build tree, is NMake particularly
slow? Do any of the other makes work more efficiently?
Be aware that nmake builds are much slower than using devenv, as nmake
starts a cl.exe process for every single file,
2007/12/11, Jason Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is not scientific but I wrote a quick perl script to compile a
simple library that we use (GCTPc). It consists of 70 C files with most
of the files between 5K and 6K, a few are as large as 70K. The script
just uses the time() function to grab
* We're using an NMake build tree, is NMake particularly
slow? Do any of the other makes work more efficiently?
Be aware that nmake builds are much slower than using devenv, as nmake starts a
cl.exe process for every single file,
whereas devenv calls cl.exe with several source
11 matches
Mail list logo
