Re: [CMake] VMWare on SCons' future

2008-03-04 Thread Brandon Van Every
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Jesper Eskilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brandon Van Every wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > > http://www.nabble.com/SCons-Future-Directions-and-Thoughts-td15176258.html > >> > >

Re: [CMake] VMWare on SCons' future

2008-03-03 Thread Jesper Eskilson
Brandon Van Every wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.nabble.com/SCons-Future-Directions-and-Thoughts-td15176258.html > you can learn tons about SCons from that thread. And there's one *really* spectacular public flame, if yo

Re: [CMake] VMWare on SCons' future

2008-03-03 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 03 March 2008, Brandon Van Every wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > VMWare is a large commercial project. > > > > http://www.nabble.com/SCons-Future-Directions-and-Thoughts-td15176258.htm > >l > > My impression so far is that SCons

Re: [CMake] VMWare on SCons' future

2008-03-03 Thread Brandon Van Every
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/SCons-Future-Directions-and-Thoughts-td15176258.html > > > you can learn tons about SCons from that thread. And there's one *really* spectacular public flame, if you need a motive to

Re: [CMake] VMWare on SCons' future

2008-03-03 Thread Brandon Van Every
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > VMWare is a large commercial project. > > > http://www.nabble.com/SCons-Future-Directions-and-Thoughts-td15176258.html > > My impression