Re: [cmake-developers] Adding argument OPTIONAL to find_package() and add_subdirectory

2011-06-23 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 22 June 2011, Brad King wrote: On 06/21/2011 03:25 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Ok, I pushed the branch again. The new name looks better. Perhaps I missed this last time, but the documentation of the variable within the command is back up in the simple section. Yes, you

Re: [cmake-developers] Adding argument OPTIONAL to find_package() and add_subdirectory

2011-06-23 Thread Brad King
On 06/23/2011 05:12 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Please put it at the very bottom of the entire documentation, just above the note about NO_POLICY_SCOPE. Done. Thanks. The topic looks good. Please merge it to 'next' when you're ready. -Brad ___

Re: [cmake-developers] Adding argument OPTIONAL to find_package() and add_subdirectory

2011-06-23 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 23 June 2011, Brad King wrote: On 06/23/2011 05:12 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Please put it at the very bottom of the entire documentation, just above the note about NO_POLICY_SCOPE. Done. Thanks. The topic looks good. Please merge it to 'next' when you're ready.

Re: [cmake-developers] Adding argument OPTIONAL to find_package() and add_subdirectory

2011-06-23 Thread Michael Wild
On 06/23/2011 04:11 PM, Brad King wrote: On 06/23/2011 09:53 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Thursday 23 June 2011, Brad King wrote: On 06/23/2011 05:12 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Please put it at the very bottom of the entire documentation, just above the note about NO_POLICY_SCOPE.

Re: [cmake-developers] Adding argument OPTIONAL to find_package() and add_subdirectory

2011-06-23 Thread Brad King
On 06/23/2011 10:36 AM, Michael Wild wrote: On 06/23/2011 04:11 PM, Brad King wrote: We manually select topics from 'next' and merge them to 'master'. Only topics in master will be released. So, how does that work? Do you look for the merges in 'next' that you like, and then re-merge them

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake 0012301]: CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE not set on MinGW

2011-06-23 Thread Clinton Stimpson
On Thursday, June 23, 2011 10:45:25 am Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2011-06-22 22:06-0600 Clinton Stimpson wrote: This issue is with how Qt plugins are compiled. It has come up a couple times in the past, but this might be the first with MinGW. When Qt is configured, a build key is generated

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake 0012301]: CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE not set on MinGW

2011-06-23 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2011-06-23 10:22-0600 Clinton Stimpson wrote: FYI, I realized a patch to UseQt4.cmake could fix this qt-plugin/no-build-type problem. See here: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commit;h=5a2b20 Maybe it'll make it in 2.8.5? Hi Clint: I am replying to your above off-list comment on

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake 0012301]: CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE not set on MinGW

2011-06-23 Thread Clinton Stimpson
On Thursday, June 23, 2011 11:10:24 am Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2011-06-23 10:22-0600 Clinton Stimpson wrote: FYI, I realized a patch to UseQt4.cmake could fix this qt-plugin/no-build-type problem. See here: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commit;h=5a2b20 Maybe it'll make it in