[cmake-developers] [CMake 0012861]: PROJECT command not documented

2012-01-06 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12861 == Reported By:manday Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] CheckSymbolExists is unreliable

2012-01-06 Thread Brad King
On 1/6/2012 2:49 PM, Brad King wrote: On 1/6/2012 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: The difference is that my test only does configuration and does not build an executable, so the --build-and-test stuff will not work. Lots of tests are like that. They just create a tiny dummy executable to build

Re: [cmake-developers] CheckSymbolExists is unreliable

2012-01-06 Thread Brad King
On 1/6/2012 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: The difference is that my test only does configuration and does not build an executable, so the --build-and-test stuff will not work. Lots of tests are like that. They just create a tiny dummy executable to build and link. That's why I pointed at Che

Re: [cmake-developers] CheckSymbolExists is unreliable

2012-01-06 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Brad King wrote: > On 1/5/2012 8:25 AM, Brad King wrote: > >> So I will go and fix some small typos I've found in the existing > >> tests, > >> repush and merge to next, so we see if Check*SymbolExists will work. > > > > Sounds good. > However the CheckCXXSymbolExist test fails: > > http://www

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0012659]: FindSphinx.cmake

2012-01-06 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12659 == Reported By:Arnaud Gelas Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] CheckSymbolExists is unreliable

2012-01-06 Thread Brad King
On 1/5/2012 8:25 AM, Brad King wrote: So I will go and fix some small typos I've found in the existing tests, repush and merge to next, so we see if Check*SymbolExists will work. Sounds good. The new CheckSymbolExists test works everywhere! http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?proje