Re: [cmake-developers] Ninja generator on Windows

2012-02-18 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:19:15PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 31.01.2012 23:40, Peter Collingbourne wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:32:23PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >>> On 31.01.2012 16:19, Peter Collingbourne wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:15:59AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >>>

Re: [cmake-developers] ninja spaces in the path do not work on linux

2012-02-18 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:16:31PM +0100, Nicolas Desprès wrote: > 2012/2/17 Bill Hoffman > > > On 2/17/2012 12:26 PM, Nicolas Desprès wrote: > > > >> > >> I think it is a bug in the generator which do not escape the space > >> properly using the $ character as supported by Ninja. > >> > >> -- >

Re: [cmake-developers] Some numbers on cmake+ninja+VS on Windows

2012-02-18 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 18.02.2012 21:27, Óscar Fuentes wrote: Setup: Windows XP SP3 32 bits running on VMWare Workstation 8.0.1 with 4 real cores (no HT) assigned out of 4 available on the host machine, which is Kubuntu 11.08 64 bits (kernel version 3.0.0-16-generic). Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate. JOM 0.9.4 (that's

[cmake-developers] Build faild on Darwin? Don't know why?

2012-02-18 Thread Eric Noulard
My recent commit on CPack-dynamicDocSection http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=shortlog;h=e175af3e74006e6f3a4fdaead20522b29034c45b may have broken this build http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=135708291&build=2018382 the trouble is I cannot imagine why, since most of the modification w

[cmake-developers] Some numbers on cmake+ninja+VS on Windows

2012-02-18 Thread Óscar Fuentes
Setup: Windows XP SP3 32 bits running on VMWare Workstation 8.0.1 with 4 real cores (no HT) assigned out of 4 available on the host machine, which is Kubuntu 11.08 64 bits (kernel version 3.0.0-16-generic). Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate. JOM 0.9.4 (that's an old version, but on my experience newer v

Re: [cmake-developers] How to cleanly get rid of CMake specific properties?

2012-02-18 Thread Eric Noulard
2012/2/18 Alexander Neundorf : > On Saturday 18 February 2012, Eric Noulard wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm pursuing my quest for a better CPack doc. >> First set of modifications are in master: >>  cpack --help-command-xxx >>  cpack --help-variable-xxx >> works. >> >> However variables are somehow "pr

Re: [cmake-developers] Making Config.cmake files easier to write

2012-02-18 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday 18 February 2012, Eric Noulard wrote: ... > >>> include(CMakePackageConfigHelpers) > >>> create_and_install_package_config_files(NAME Foo > >>>CONFIG_TEMPLATE FooConfig.cmake.in > >>>DESTINATION ${LIB_INSTALL_DIR}/Foo/cmake > >>>

Re: [cmake-developers] How to cleanly get rid of CMake specific properties?

2012-02-18 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday 18 February 2012, Eric Noulard wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm pursuing my quest for a better CPack doc. > First set of modifications are in master: > cpack --help-command-xxx > cpack --help-variable-xxx > works. > > However variables are somehow "problematic" because I get all the > prope

[cmake-developers] How to cleanly get rid of CMake specific properties?

2012-02-18 Thread Eric Noulard
Hi all, I'm pursuing my quest for a better CPack doc. First set of modifications are in master: cpack --help-command-xxx cpack --help-variable-xxx works. However variables are somehow "problematic" because I get all the properties defined for CMake in the doc because variables are a special kin

Re: [cmake-developers] Making Config.cmake files easier to write

2012-02-18 Thread Eric Noulard
2012/2/17 Eric Noulard : > 2012/2/17 Alexander Neundorf : >> On Friday 17 February 2012, Eric Noulard wrote: >>> 2012/2/17 Alexander Neundorf : >>> > On Thursday 16 February 2012, Brad King wrote: >>> >> On 2/16/2012 1:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: >>> >> > Actually I expected I would prefer thi

Re: [cmake-developers] find_package error wording

2012-02-18 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday 17 February 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Friday 17 February 2012, Brad King wrote: > > On 2/17/2012 5:05 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > I think the nicer MODULE_MODE and CONFIG_MODE keywords are not worth > > > breaking backward compatibility of users projects (not cmake) thi

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0012975]: Various typo and formatting fixes in manual pages

2012-02-18 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=12975 == Reported By:Modestas Vainius Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0012974]: FindQT3

2012-02-18 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12974 == Reported By:mtgrasse Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] ninja broken on windows?

2012-02-18 Thread Peter Kümmel
I've created on stage the new branch 'ninja-generator-win'. It differs from 'ninja-generator' only by one small commit: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=3bda549dd1dc4a739e7a7f1b23ce98b59986940f (when someone cherry-pick this commit, please also delete this branch) I've m