[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013986]: Target names may not contain a plus sign anymore

2013-03-06 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13986 == Reported By:Benjamin Kloster Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] Preparing for 2.8.11-rc1

2013-03-06 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 05 March 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote: Alexander Neundorf wrote: did you get around to add handling for usr-move to the relative directory references for exports-files ? Otherwise I'll see whether I find time this week. I didn't work more on that, no, as I wrote here:

Re: [cmake-developers] Preparing for 2.8.11-rc1

2013-03-06 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 06 March 2013, Brad King wrote: On 3/5/2013 5:05 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: Stephen Kelly wrote: So, I think it's mature enough for release now, yes. It might be worth documenting it a bit more prominently though... Any opinion on this? I think the patch can be

Re: [cmake-developers] Preparing for 2.8.11-rc1

2013-03-06 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Stephen Kelly wrote: https://gitorious.org/~steveire/cmake/steveires-cmake/commit/96ec58003de583 794fb7440fc4b3521f272a26d6 in, but then again, the behavior of code like that won't change until the next release, and a policy will probably be needed anyway. So you introduce new stuff now

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013988]: Ninja: generated files like moc, huge deps list (bis)

2013-03-06 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13988 == Reported By:bamiaux Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] Preparing for 2.8.11-rc1

2013-03-06 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote: You may have already realised that, for the same reason, I didn't work more on this stuff either: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/6106/focu s=6161 That branch was just a proof of concept. Oh, ok, here I assumed you would have