[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014003]: Add SEMICOLON generator expression

2013-03-12 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14003 == Reported By:Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] Documentation tweaks

2013-03-12 Thread Petr Kmoch
Hi all, I've created a small patch with a few minor documentation enhancements, mainly things I was looking for in the docs but didn't find them there. I hope you find it useful. Petr 0001-Enhnance-documentation.patch Description: Binary data -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware

Re: [cmake-developers] Documentation tweaks

2013-03-12 Thread Brad King
On 03/12/2013 04:48 AM, Petr Kmoch wrote: I've created a small patch with a few minor documentation enhancements, mainly things I was looking for in the docs but didn't find them there. I hope you find it useful. Thanks, applied: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=3cf2f67a

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014004]: FindSDL fails to find headers for cross-compilation

2013-03-12 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14004 == Reported By:Quintus Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] Modules/Compiler: TI DSP/ARM

2013-03-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, I would like to note that the TI-DSP-ASM/C/CXX.cmake files would look like exactly the same for TI-ARM-ASM/C/CXX.cmake. The interface is the same for both toolchains. I presume you can just remove the DSP in there from the file name (or in worse case, add an arm overload)?

Re: [cmake-developers] Modules/Compiler: TI DSP/ARM

2013-03-12 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 12 March 2013, Laszlo Papp wrote: Hi, I would like to note that the TI-DSP-ASM/C/CXX.cmake files would look like exactly the same for TI-ARM-ASM/C/CXX.cmake. The interface is the same for both toolchains. I presume you can just remove the DSP in there from the file name (or in

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014005]: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::logic_error'

2013-03-12 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14005 == Reported By:Alexander Polunin Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] Modules/Compiler: TI DSP/ARM

2013-03-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote: oh, this is working for you too ? Cool :-) I have not tried yet, but I know both toolchains now. They use the same interface. They only have different backend implementations as far as I can tell. Do you know for

Re: [cmake-developers] linked-usage-cleanup regressed automoc

2013-03-12 Thread Brad King
On 03/11/2013 07:01 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: Stephen Kelly wrote: Alexander Neundorf wrote: The patch only avoided that specific situation when it occured with automoc, but the same situation can also happen independent from automoc. Not really, the attached case can only crash because of

Re: [cmake-developers] linked-usage-cleanup regressed automoc

2013-03-12 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 12 March 2013, Brad King wrote: On 03/11/2013 06:54 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: Alexander Neundorf wrote: Unfortunately this patch creates bug ( http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13999 ) and doesn't fix the actual problem, the crash is still there. Before this patch,

Re: [cmake-developers] linked-usage-cleanup regressed automoc

2013-03-12 Thread Brad King
On 03/12/2013 06:08 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: The original use case in this thread has a header-only target whose C++ linker language comes from the automoc source. This preserves that functionality too. I'm not sure this is functionality, and not actually a bug, see below. It worked