The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14003
==
Reported By:Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
Assigned To:
Hi all,
I've created a small patch with a few minor documentation
enhancements, mainly things I was looking for in the docs but didn't
find them there. I hope you find it useful.
Petr
0001-Enhnance-documentation.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
On 03/12/2013 04:48 AM, Petr Kmoch wrote:
I've created a small patch with a few minor documentation
enhancements, mainly things I was looking for in the docs but didn't
find them there. I hope you find it useful.
Thanks, applied:
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=3cf2f67a
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14004
==
Reported By:Quintus
Assigned To:
Hi,
I would like to note that the TI-DSP-ASM/C/CXX.cmake files would look like
exactly the same for TI-ARM-ASM/C/CXX.cmake. The interface is the same for
both toolchains. I presume you can just remove the DSP in there from the
file name (or in worse case, add an arm overload)?
On Tuesday 12 March 2013, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Hi,
I would like to note that the TI-DSP-ASM/C/CXX.cmake files would look like
exactly the same for TI-ARM-ASM/C/CXX.cmake. The interface is the same for
both toolchains. I presume you can just remove the DSP in there from the
file name (or in
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14005
==
Reported By:Alexander Polunin
Assigned To:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote:
oh, this is working for you too ?
Cool :-)
I have not tried yet, but I know both toolchains now. They use the same
interface. They only have different backend implementations as far as I can
tell.
Do you know for
On 03/11/2013 07:01 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
The patch only avoided that specific situation when it occured with
automoc, but the same situation can also happen independent from automoc.
Not really, the attached case can only crash because of
On Tuesday 12 March 2013, Brad King wrote:
On 03/11/2013 06:54 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Unfortunately this patch creates bug (
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13999 ) and doesn't fix the
actual problem, the crash is still there.
Before this patch,
On 03/12/2013 06:08 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
The original use case in this thread has a header-only target whose
C++ linker language comes from the automoc source. This preserves
that functionality too.
I'm not sure this is functionality, and not actually a bug, see below.
It worked
11 matches
Mail list logo