Re: [cmake-developers] GIT push access please

2014-02-16 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 22:53:42 +, Dan Cristiu wrote: I'd like to push a couple of changes to the VS11/12 generators. They are currently ignoring non-default CMake platforms, with the exception of WinCE. Found a bug related to this issue: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14673

Re: [cmake-developers] [New Module] FindOpenCL, FindHg

2014-02-16 Thread Matthäus G. Chajdas
Hi Eike, thanks for reviewing! I've just pushed a new version, which should fix all the issues you mentioned. I'm also setting now Hg_FOUND using FOUND_VAR (this is also recommended in the documentation.) Anything more left to do? The only thing which bothers me is the _VERSION_STRING in FindHg

[cmake-developers] DeployQt5/generalizing DeployQt4 for Qt5

2014-02-16 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
Hi, Is anyone working on, or have, a DeployQt5 or a generalized DeployQt4? We use it in our packaging process, and it is one of the last things I need to switch to Qt 5. If not, I was going to take a look at this, and see what I can put together. Thanks, Marcus -- Powered by www.kitware.com

Re: [cmake-developers] [New Module] FindOpenCL, FindHg

2014-02-16 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Sonntag, 16. Februar 2014, 18:43:01 schrieb Matthäus G. Chajdas: Hi Eike, thanks for reviewing! I've just pushed a new version, which should fix all the issues you mentioned. I'm also setting now Hg_FOUND using FOUND_VAR (this is also recommended in the documentation.) Anything more

Re: [cmake-developers] [New Module] FindOpenCL, FindHg

2014-02-16 Thread Matthäus G. Chajdas
Hi, couldn't find it in the documentation either :( I've changed it to OPENCL_VERSION_STRING. Should I apply for commit access now? Cheers, Matthäus On 16.02.2014 20:10, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: Am Sonntag, 16. Februar 2014, 18:43:01 schrieb Matthäus G. Chajdas: Hi Eike, thanks for

Re: [cmake-developers] [New Module] FindOpenCL, FindHg

2014-02-16 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Sonntag, 16. Februar 2014, 20:26:22 schrieb Matthäus G. Chajdas: Hi, couldn't find it in the documentation either :( Help/manual/cmake-developer.7.rst I've changed it to OPENCL_VERSION_STRING. Should be OpenCL_VERSION_STRING: the variables should follow the casing of the module name.

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014757]: Reduce output of install step

2014-02-16 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14757 == Reported By:Kevin Burge Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] [New Module] FindOpenCL, FindHg

2014-02-16 Thread Matthäus G. Chajdas
Hi Eike, thanks again! I've just read the Wiki regarding commit access, and it says I should wait for acceptance on the mailing list before applying for access. This is the first time ever I try to contribute something to CMake, so please bear with me if I'm missing something here. Should I ping

Re: [cmake-developers] [New Module] FindOpenCL, FindHg

2014-02-16 Thread Stephen Kelly
Rolf Eike Beer wrote: Am Sonntag, 16. Februar 2014, 18:43:01 schrieb Matthäus G. Chajdas: Hi Eike, thanks for reviewing! I've just pushed a new version, which should fix all the issues you mentioned. I'm also setting now Hg_FOUND using FOUND_VAR (this is also recommended in the

Re: [cmake-developers] GIT push access please

2014-02-16 Thread Stephen Kelly
Dan Cristiu wrote: Would appreciate if anyone could give me a hand in obtaining developer access. Usually, in cases where there is still design discussion to be done, it is preferred to put a topic on a publically hosted git repo for review instead of pushing to the cmake repo (where it gets

Re: [cmake-developers] DeployQt5/generalizing DeployQt4 for Qt5

2014-02-16 Thread Stephen Kelly
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: Hi, Is anyone working on, or have, a DeployQt5 or a generalized DeployQt4? We use it in our packaging process, and it is one of the last things I need to switch to Qt 5. If not, I was going to take a look at this, and see what I can put together. I've never used

Re: [cmake-developers] DeployQt5/generalizing DeployQt4 for Qt5

2014-02-16 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: Hi, Is anyone working on, or have, a DeployQt5 or a generalized DeployQt4? We use it in our packaging process, and it is one of the last things I need to switch to Qt 5. If not, I was going to

Re: [cmake-developers] DeployQt5/generalizing DeployQt4 for Qt5

2014-02-16 Thread Stephen Kelly
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: Hi, Is anyone working on, or have, a DeployQt5 or a generalized DeployQt4? We use it in our packaging process, and it is one of the last things I need to switch to

Re: [cmake-developers] GIT push access please

2014-02-16 Thread Dan Cristiu
Thanks Steve, that makes sense. I have my fork as well, was just waiting for someone to clear the waters with regards to reviewing and committing the changes. Anyhow, I realized I want to take it a step further anyway. On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:

[cmake-developers] VS10-12 generators deserve much more love

2014-02-16 Thread Dan Cristiu
Wanted to add a simple change to the VS11 generator to support non-default toolsets, but after taking another look through the code for the VS10 generator and above, I decided I wasn't happy with the result. It shows those files have been the result of years of patches, with much of the code just