Hi,
I noticed that FindJNI and FindJava have recently become unmaintained:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Module_Maintainers#List
I care about these modules a lot, as we use CMake for building our Java
native libraries and the interfacing Java code across Linux, Windows, and
Mac OS X at OpenGamm
On 02/17/2014 02:27 PM, "Matthäus G. Chajdas" wrote:
> As I said in the last mail, how do we continue from here on? Are the
> modules ready for acceptance, and if so, who is the person to ask for
> commit access, or is there something left to fix?
Please follow the instructions here:
http://www.
On 02/19/2014 10:27 AM, Graham Markall wrote:
> I would like to volunteer to maintain FindJava and FindJNI
> would this be acceptable?
Yes, thanks. I've been doing some work on the modules myself
but would appreciate help and expertise from someone that actually
uses them in practice. Some issue
Hi Folks,
I updated the 'release' branch to prepare 3.0.0-rc1, merged it to
'master', added the post-3.0.0 development version update, and
re-started 'next' from there. I rebased active topics on the stage
onto the post-3.0.0 master and merged them to the new 'next'.
This approach represents a c
Hi Steve(s),
On 02/12/2014 12:06 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Steve Wilson wrote:
>
>> I saved a copy of the branch in another of the repository. The commit
>> numbers didn’t change and as far as I can tell they are still in the same
>> order that I had them in when I initially pushed the branch.
Brad King wrote:
> What is the status of this topic currently? It adds a great feature!
I've been waiting for master to re-open for features before working on it.
Here are some open issues:
1) INTERFACE_LINK_OPTIONS presents a new issue that was not present before
with the LINK_FLAGS. If I u
On 02/19/2014 11:00 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> I've been waiting for master to re-open for features before working on it.
It is now open for post-3.0 development :)
> 1) INTERFACE_LINK_OPTIONS presents a new issue that was not present before
> with the LINK_FLAGS. If I understand correctly, if
Brad King wrote:
> On 02/19/2014 11:00 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> I've been waiting for master to re-open for features before working on
>> it.
>
> It is now open for post-3.0 development :)
Yep, great. Much better than waiting for weeks during RC phase. :)
>> Consider splitting the use-cases
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Brad King wrote:
> Some issues have been raised here:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/9226
>
> that I've not had time to address, for example.
>
> Please follow the instructions here:
>
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Modul
Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Brad informed me that Stephen Kelly is already working on two other
>> policies and CMP0050 is the latest on master, so I'll take CMP0053 for
>> the new EVIS parser behavior.
>
> Thanks, ok with me.
By the way, I have only started working on policy CMP0051, not CMP0052, s
I’m happy to keep working on the topic as well. I just have to let it bubble
back up to the top of my queue.
SteveW
On Feb 19, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Brad King wrote:
>
>> On 02/19/2014 11:00 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>> I've been waiting for master to re-open for features
Hi,
I'm following that guide -- I have a Mantis & CDash account, and I'm at
step 4 which is "wait for acceptance". Most projects I know have some
policy like "ping the maintainer after two weeks" or ask the code owner
or similar if a patch is in limbo. I have no problem waiting longer, but
it woul
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14765
==
Reported By:Alexander Richardson
Assigned To:
Hi Graham,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Graham Markall wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Brad King wrote:
>
>> Some issues have been raised here:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/9226
>>
>> that I've not had time to address, for example.
>>
>> P
On 02/19/2014 02:40 PM, "Matthäus G. Chajdas" wrote:
> I'm following that guide -- I have a Mantis & CDash account, and I'm at
> step 4 which is "wait for acceptance"
The fact that I've asked you to do this *is* the acceptance, as in
acceptance of your offer to add and maintain these modules.
Tha
15 matches
Mail list logo
