Re: [cmake-developers] Compiler features/extensions remaining/future issues

2014-06-09 Thread Stephen Kelly
Ben Boeckel wrote: I'm seeing considerable performance impact of this feature, even when it isn't used: Can you create an sscce? Are there many static libraries involved? Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014963]: Add explicit specification of custom command side effect outputs

2014-06-09 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14963 == Reported By:Brad King Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] Modules/FindLua51.cmake: lua5.1 include path seems wrong

2014-06-09 Thread Brad King
On 06/08/2014 09:12 AM, o.k...@gmx.de wrote: I deleted the additional include/ in FindLua51.cmake and it worked. I think that is the correct fix. I do not know why they were there in the first place. They appear in FindLua50, FindLua51, and the version-agnostic FindLua module. Eike, did you

Re: [cmake-developers] Combining ABI and Feature checks (was: Compiler features/extensions remaining/future issues)

2014-06-09 Thread Brad King
Steve, On 06/08/2014 06:56 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: 9) Performance Ben's concerns are more important than the following, but I also wonder if we can reduce the startup time by combining the ABI and Feature checks: # Try to identify the ABI and configure it into CMakeCCompiler.cmake

Re: [cmake-developers] Modules/FindLua51.cmake: lua5.1 include path seems wrong

2014-06-09 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Montag, 9. Juni 2014, 10:00:35 schrieben Sie: On 06/08/2014 09:12 AM, o.k...@gmx.de wrote: I deleted the additional include/ in FindLua51.cmake and it worked. I think that is the correct fix. I do not know why they were there in the first place. They appear in FindLua50, FindLua51, and

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014964]: Command line scanning is bad with spaces

2014-06-09 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14964 == Reported By:Linus Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] Compiler features/extensions remaining/future issues

2014-06-09 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:46:42 -0400, David Cole wrote: Can you create an sscce? Not really. The wall time impact is only really visible on sizeable projects and the jitter in the time can be masked in smaller projects. The smallest you're probably going to get is VTK without searching for

[cmake-developers] add_compile_options and link flags

2014-06-09 Thread Ben Boeckel
Hi, So add_compile_options exists now, but is still not a 100% replacement for CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_${config} because the flags are only used for the .c - .o step and not for linking. Some flags need to be passed to the linker as well (in my case, profiling flags, but I imagine other tooling flags,

Re: [cmake-developers] add_compile_options and link flags

2014-06-09 Thread Brad King
Steve W, On 06/09/2014 11:46 AM, Brad King wrote: See thread here: push of LinkOptionsCommand topic branch http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/9203 IIRC there were a couple of minor unresolved issues but it is mostly just waiting for someone to have time to

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014965]: Add LLVM IR bitcode language

2014-06-09 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14965 == Reported By:sdough Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014966]: cmake succeeds evaluating a script that is a directory

2014-06-09 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14966 == Reported By:Christopher Yeleighton Assigned To: