Hi
I'm suspecting that this block in FindCurses
https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/blob/master/Modules/FindCurses.cmake#L182-L185
should go away, unless there is something I have missed.
if (NOT CURSES_TINFO_HAS_CBREAK)
find_library(CURSES_EXTRA_LIBRARY cur_colr HINTS ${_cursesLibDir})
On 15/11/14 12:36, Gregor Jasny wrote:
the current version now properly checks for proper nesting
of the continue keyword. To detect new scope blocks like
for example a function() I hoked into the Push/PopScope
functions.
I just noticed that return() handling is broken. I'm also
working on a
On 11/15/2014 03:34 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Ruslan Baratov wrote:
Done. Also I've found parse issue which is based on `sscanf` behaviour,
e.g. string '123xyz' will be successfully parsed as a integer (%d). Same
issue for example in file(STRINGS) command:
I use strtol()/strtoul() for this
On 11/16/2014 04:12 AM, ゑ wrote:
I tried to 'FIND_PACKAGE(MFC)' on VS2013(community), but MFC not found.
VS2013 has no mfc120.dll but has mfc120u.dll,
so I make a patch for FindMFC.cmake,
This is not just the community edition but any VS 2013. The MBCS
(non-unicode) versions of the MFC
Hi Folks,
Picking up from this old thread:
explicit custom command side-effects (was: Severe regression caused by #14972
fixes)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/11207/focus=11225
and this issue:
Add explicit specification of custom command side effect
On 10/08/2014 10:26 AM, Brad King wrote:
Both add_custom_target and add_custom_command can run operations that
produce side-effects. Both commands need a way to specify any side
effects they produce. Perhaps a new option like GENERATES can be
added for this.
For reference in list archives,
Original draft by Doug Barbieri.
Signed-off-by: Gregor Jasny gja...@googlemail.com
---
Help/command/continue.rst | 7 +++
Source/cmBootstrapCommands1.cxx| 2 +
Source/cmContinueCommand.cxx | 21 +
Hello,
the current version now properly checks for proper nesting
of the continue keyword. To detect new scope blocks like
for example a function() I hoked into the Push/PopScope
functions.
I have some questions:
1) The Scope variable stack is held in a 'internal' structure
that gets special
To track the nested loop levels a counter is used.
It gets incremented while entering a loop block
(e.g. foreach or while) and gets decremented when leaving
the block. Because scope borders for example at function
borders must be taken into account the counter is put into
a stack. With every new
Signed-off-by: Gregor Jasny gja...@googlemail.com
---
Help/manual/cmake-policies.7.rst | 1 +
Help/policy/CMP0055.rst| 17 +
Source/cmBreakCommand.cxx | 33 ++
Source/cmPolicies.cxx
FWD to developers list. I think this is a documentation issue.
Luis Felipe Dominguez Vega lfdoming...@estudiantes.uci.cu schrieb am Mon
Nov 17 2014 at 5:42:55 PM:
I can't see into the source code of cmake, into the
cmTargetIncludeDirectoriesCommand.cxx somethink like import the
On 11/17/2014 02:00 PM, Gregor Jasny wrote:
the current version now properly checks for proper nesting
of the continue keyword.
Cool, thanks.
1) The Scope variable stack is held in a 'internal' structure
that gets special treatment in the cmMakefile copy ctor.
I don't know the
Hi there,
First, I would like to thank you for your amazing work on CMake, CPack and
CTest.
I've been trying to make multiple RPMs using components, but it appears
that the component variables such
as CPACK_RPM_componentName_PACKAGE_REQUIRES are not correctly unset.
Worse, they are propagated to
On 11/17/2014 02:09 PM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
FWD to developers list. I think this is a documentation issue.
Luis Felipe Dominguez Vega schrieb am Mon Nov 17 2014 at 5:42:55 PM:
I can't see into the source code of cmake, into the
cmTargetIncludeDirectoriesComm__and.cxx somethink
On 11/17/2014 02:46 PM, Gauthier Lamaison wrote:
I've been trying to make multiple RPMs using components, but it appears
that the component variables such as
CPACK_RPM_componentName_PACKAGE_REQUIRES
are not correctly unset. Worse, they are propagated to other components
(that's how I found
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15254
==
Reported By:Jonnhy Fisher
Assigned To:
2014-11-17 21:09 GMT+01:00 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com:
On 11/17/2014 02:46 PM, Gauthier Lamaison wrote:
I've been trying to make multiple RPMs using components, but it appears
that the component variables such as
CPACK_RPM_componentName_PACKAGE_REQUIRES
are not correctly unset. Worse,
2014-11-17 23:05 GMT+01:00 Domen Vrankar domen.vran...@gmail.com:
2014-11-17 21:09 GMT+01:00 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com:
On 11/17/2014 02:46 PM, Gauthier Lamaison wrote:
I've been trying to make multiple RPMs using components, but it appears
that the component variables such as
Thanks for the feedback. I made some changes and rebased on the trunk.
The hunk in Modules/CMakeSystemSpecificInformation.cmake is now just removing
a blank line so it should not be needed.
Removed
+message(GHS-DetermineCompiler.cmake)
This looks like a leftover debugging message.
Removed
Gauthier would you also be willing to write a test for this patch?
Sure ! I'll dig into that.
You could extend the test that is already on master branch of git
repository in directory cmake/Tests/CPackComponentsForAll.
MyLibCPackConfig-IgnoreGroup.cmake.in contains the location where you
On 17-Nov-14 18:06, Brad King wrote:
Yes, please change to that so a proper error can be produced for the new
API when 123xyz is given as a timeout, for example.
Function added cmSystemTools::StringToInt
Please look at adding a case to the test suite for this. An outer
process could take the
Hi David,
Can you give me some information on your current setup? What build of VS do you
have installed, which options? I think that the detection logic for the tests
is missing some cases. I'm guessing that this is similar to what I recently
fixed in CMake for the express editions, the same
22 matches
Mail list logo
