Re: [cmake-developers] Patch: Add the ability to specify SDK_REFERENCES for Visual Studio

I've changed it to the Debug Universal C-Runtime which should be included with the SDK. This also leverages the version of the SDK to match the other extensions reducing the risk of failures. -Original Message- From: Brad King [mailto:brad.k...@kitware.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Re: [cmake-developers] Using a custom DSL compiler in CMake

Brad, Thanks for the detailed response. This all makes a lot of sense. I’ll have to stew on this a bit and see where it leads me. In general it sounds to me like there is no easy solution here. Thanks, -Chris > On Jun 21, 2016, at 1:05 PM, Brad King wrote: > > On 06/21/2016 02:18 PM, Chris B

Re: [cmake-developers] Using a custom DSL compiler in CMake

On 06/21/2016 02:18 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote: > Our current solution to work with this tool in CMake For reference, a quick look at LLVM's `cmake/modules/TableGen.cmake` indicates that the current solution is based on add_custom_command. > The harder part is that our DSL supports C-like includes.

Re: [cmake-developers] Using a custom DSL compiler in CMake

On 21/06/2016 18:18, Chris Bieneman wrote: Hello cmake-developers, I’m trying to find a solution to a long running problem in our build. In LLVM we have a domain specific language named TableGen that we use to generate header files used throughout the project. Our current solution to work with

[cmake-developers] Using a custom DSL compiler in CMake

Hello cmake-developers, I’m trying to find a solution to a long running problem in our build. In LLVM we have a domain specific language named TableGen that we use to generate header files used throughout the project. Our current solution to work with this tool in CMake is pretty terrible for a

Re: [cmake-developers] can't upgrade cmake 2.8 on CentOS

On 06/21/2016 02:25 PM, Thomas Beaudry wrote: > in the root directory I see the following directories: > bin doc man share > I tried doing a "make && make install" or a "cmake ." Those are prebuilt binaries. You don't need to build anything. You can run `bin/cmake` right out of the extracted

[cmake-developers] can't upgrade cmake 2.8 on CentOS

Hi, I am trying to upgrade my cmake 2.8 on CentOS. I have tried unsuccessfully installing both versions 3.4.3 and 3.5.2 (i tried using both the .sh and .tar.gz). After downloading and unzipping, in the root directory I see the following directories: bin doc man share I tried doing a "ma

Re: [cmake-developers] [patch] iOS combined, some fixes

Is the patch applied? Let me know if there are any questions left about it. On 15-Jun-16 23:38, Ruslan Baratov via cmake-developers wrote: On 15-Jun-16 22:59, Gregor Jasny wrote: Hello, Thanks for the patch! On 15/06/16 16:41, Ruslan Baratov wrote: Sending some fixes found by testing with Xc

Re: [cmake-developers] Patch: Add the ability to specify SDK_REFERENCES for Visual Studio

I'll take a look to find an sdk that is included. Sent from my Windows 10 phone From: Brad King Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 7:31 To: Gilles Khouzam Cc: cmake-developers@cmake.org Subject: Re

Re: [cmake-developers] Patch: Add the ability to specify SDK_REFERENCES for Visual Studio

On 06/20/2016 10:48 AM, Brad King wrote: > VS: Add VS_SDK_REFERENCES target property to reference external SDKs > https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=ccc6270d This caused the VSWinStorePhone tests to fail, e.g.: https://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=457508384&build=442206

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 32 and 64 bit packages on Windows

On 06/21/2016 03:37 PM, Brad King wrote: Nils, the installers in question were produced from your WiX installer work (thanks again for that!). Is this something wrong with the 64-bit installer or simply a Windows/MSI subtlety/bug? I can't try this out here right now but looking at the windo

Re: [cmake-developers] How to set startup project in Visual Studio

On 06/20/2016 05:11 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > documentation which directory to set the DIRECTORY property on. I've updated the documentation: Help: Clarify VS_STARTUP_PROJECT documentation https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=d3e538ea -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Ple

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 32 and 64 bit packages on Windows

On 06/20/2016 05:10 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > * Install the CMake 3.6 RC 64 bit package > ** The install location for CMake 3.6 RC 64 bit was not added to my PATH? I just un-installed my 64-bit RC and re-installed it with the option to manipulate the system PATH. At this point the PATH as report

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH] add debug glew to FindGLEW

On 06/21/2016 05:33 AM, Farbos a wrote: > I am not sure to understand why you removed GLEW_LIBRARY: > > -mark_as_advanced(GLEW_INCLUDE_DIR GLEW_LIBRARY) > +mark_as_advanced(GLEW_INCLUDE_DIR) We no longer define the GLEW_LIBRARY cache entry ourselves, only read it for legacy reasons, so we are not

Re: [cmake-developers] speed up package with mingw on Windows host

On 06/20/2016 05:05 PM, laurent wrote: > Could you make the correction by yourself or do I need to re-send my > patch with correct full name ? Applied, thanks: GetPrerequisites: Optimize on Windows by filtering `objdump` output https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=867b73e2 -Brad

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH] add debug glew to FindGLEW

I am not sure to understand why you removed GLEW_LIBRARY: -mark_as_advanced(GLEW_INCLUDE_DIR GLEW_LIBRARY) +mark_as_advanced(GLEW_INCLUDE_DIR) 2016-06-20 21:09 GMT+02:00 Brad King : > On 06/20/2016 10:52 AM, Farbos a wrote: >> Here is the patch fixed. > > Thanks, applied: > > FindGLEW: Search f

Re: [cmake-developers] How can we add Find****

On 06/21/2016 10:57 AM, Farbos a wrote: I was wondering how can we add new Find.cmake. For examples I don't see any FindTBB, FindJsonCpp ... and I think some of them are used a lot. So my question is, Who decide if we can add new Find*** ? See https://cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Module_Maintainer

[cmake-developers] How can we add Find****

Hi, I was wondering how can we add new Find.cmake. For examples I don't see any FindTBB, FindJsonCpp ... and I think some of them are used a lot. So my question is, Who decide if we can add new Find*** ? Thanks, -- Arnaud FARBOS -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topi