evelop maintainers)
[1] In fact, I wonder if we should just ditch that generator altogether(?)
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the C
t; * ...
While it probably still makes sense to have it for Unix Makefiles; can we just
disable this particular output in case Ninja files are used?
After all it's just a call to `cmake -E cmake_autogen`, right? Can we
parameterize this call?
Just my 2 ct.
Cheers,
Kevin
> Cheers, Daniel
--
Kevi
elop 3 is super ancient (last release around 2008
according to the interwebs). Get rid off the generator.
Cheers,
Kevin
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages
ubstantial refactoring of this code
> > since 3.2.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Brad
>
> 3.4 isn't available to me on Ubuntu 15; do you have a custom PPA I can
> add to grab the latest CMake debian package?
There are pre-built binaries here:
https://cmake.org/download/
On Sunday 13 April 2014 11:07:21 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Kevin Funk wrote:
I see that there was some discussion wrt this on the cmake ML, [3], but
actually I lack the CMake foo in order to understand this discussion's
implications. At any rate, I don't think the above behavior is intended
, is
it?
Greets
[1] http://build.kde.org/view/kdevelop/job/kdev-clang_master/5/console
[2]
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kdev-clang.gita=treehb=22e0c136a252813ff0732eba25bda79d89173682
[3]
http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/2014-February/009838.html
--
Kevin Funk
--
Powered
