Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

> Please find attached the "feature" based onto 68dba7f. I added the variable > CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_STRICT_PERMISSION and its component counterpart > for controlling strict behaviour on the files added to control.tar.gz . Thanks, applied and squashed patches with some changes to

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

Le 17/09/15 21:21, Domen Vrankar a écrit : Please find attached the "feature" based onto 68dba7f. I added the variable CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_CONTROL_STRICT_PERMISSION and its component counterpart for controlling strict behaviour on the files added to control.tar.gz . Thanks, applied and

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

Le 15/09/15 08:43, Domen Vrankar a écrit : 2015-09-14 23:49 GMT+02:00 Raffi Enficiaud : Le 14/09/15 23:34, Domen Vrankar a écrit : Thank you. However those two test are not mutually exclusive. I think having them on lintian is also a good thing. I've tried

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

2015-09-14 23:49 GMT+02:00 Raffi Enficiaud : > Le 14/09/15 23:34, Domen Vrankar a écrit : >>> >>> Thank you. However those two test are not mutually exclusive. I think >>> having >>> them on lintian is also a good thing. >> >> >> I've tried your test change before

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

> From this (thanks to lintian now I have the proper link :) ) > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/control-file-has-bad-permissions.html > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-permissions-owners > > all control files: > - should be owned by root:root (+ I would say uid/gid 0/0,

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

Le 15/09/15 11:00, Domen Vrankar a écrit : Sounds good. Those rules are written as guidelines and I'm not certain how often they are broken so could you also add a single variable for toggling between defaults described above and using file permissions as provided? I think those are not

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

Le 14/09/15 11:51, Raffi Enficiaud a écrit : Hi Brad and Domen and others, I just realized that the permissions for the extra control files should be set in a different way than for the md5sum checksum file. Please find attached the patch correcting this and the corresponding test that fires

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

Le 14/09/15 23:34, Domen Vrankar a écrit : Thank you. However those two test are not mutually exclusive. I think having them on lintian is also a good thing. I've tried your test change before but lintian test complained that 775 are invalid permissions (should be 755). Is this caused by a

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

Hi Domen, Thank you. However those two test are not mutually exclusive. I think having them on lintian is also a good thing. Best and thanks, Raffi Le 14/09/15 23:19, Domen Vrankar a écrit : I just realized that the permissions for the extra control files should be set in a different way

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

>> I just realized that the permissions for the extra control files should >> be set in a different way than for the md5sum checksum file. >> >> Please find attached the patch correcting this and the corresponding >> test that fires the problem. Thanks, applied the fix:

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

> Thank you. However those two test are not mutually exclusive. I think having > them on lintian is also a good thing. I've tried your test change before but lintian test complained that 775 are invalid permissions (should be 755). Is this caused by a different version of lintian or should I just

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

> I have made the following changes in order to: > - support the UID/GID/UNAME/GNAME and permission on tar files at creation > time > - using directly libarchive in CPackDeb > - removing completely the need of fakeroot Applied to next for testing:

Re: [cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

Le 11/09/15 21:34, Domen Vrankar a écrit : I have made the following changes in order to: - support the UID/GID/UNAME/GNAME and permission on tar files at creation time - using directly libarchive in CPackDeb - removing completely the need of fakeroot Applied to next for testing:

[cmake-developers] [CPackDeb][libarchive] removing use of fakeroot and supporting UID/GID/UNAME etc in libarchive

Hi Brad and Domen, This is a follow up of the following thread http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/2015-August/026125.html I have made the following changes in order to: - support the UID/GID/UNAME/GNAME and permission on tar files at creation time - using directly