Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

Hi Stephen, > On 03/25/2016 09:25 AM, Tobias Hunger wrote: >> I am personally rather unsure about how to proceed. I can help make >> this branch production/merge ready, but I do not want to maintain it >> indefinitely after it is merged. It touches to many CMake internals >> for me to be

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

Am 24.03.2016 16:13 schrieb "Aleix Pol" : > Hey, > I'll be going to Berlin the weekend of the 14th May (Board meeting, > I'll be busy during the weekend). > > Would it make sense for me to book one day before/after to meet and > hack on this? Hey Aleix, I did already do some

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

Am 22.02.2016 23:14 schrieb "Stephen Kelly" : > If anyone can get me a working java environment and a way to asynchronously > write stdin/stdout on long-running processes, I can write a plugin for > eclipse which would be independent of cevelop afaict. > > Do you know enough

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Monday, February 22, 2016 22:30:42 Stephen Kelly wrote: >> Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: >> > There is also https://www.cevelop.com/ which is an Eclipse derivative, >> > they may be interested ? >> >> I went all hipster reach-out.io and tweeted at them. :) > >

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

On Monday, February 22, 2016 22:30:42 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > > There is also https://www.cevelop.com/ which is an Eclipse derivative, > > they may be interested ? > > I went all hipster reach-out.io and tweeted at them. :) looks like that's an FP7-project, so I

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > There is also https://www.cevelop.com/ which is an Eclipse derivative, > they may be interested ? I went all hipster reach-out.io and tweeted at them. :) -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

There is also https://www.cevelop.com/ which is an Eclipse derivative, they may be interested ? Best, Jean-Michaël www.i-score.org On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 22:59:36 Stephen

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

On Friday, February 19, 2016 11:36:35 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 22:59:36 Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> On 02/15/2016 07:24 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > >> > Hi Dominik, > >> > > >> > Am 15.02.2016 19:01 schrieb "Dominik Haumann" > >> >

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 22:59:36 Stephen Kelly wrote: >> On 02/15/2016 07:24 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote: >> > Hi Dominik, >> > >> > Am 15.02.2016 19:01 schrieb "Dominik Haumann" >> > > > >> > >: >> > > 1. Wouldn't it

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 22:59:36 Stephen Kelly wrote: > On 02/15/2016 07:24 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > Hi Dominik, > > > > Am 15.02.2016 19:01 schrieb "Dominik Haumann" > > > >: > > > 1. Wouldn't it make sense you have a developer sprint

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > On 02/15/2016 07:24 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > Hi Dominik, > > Am 15.02.2016 19:01 schrieb "Dominik Haumann" : >> 1. Wouldn't it make sense you have a developer sprint ASAP for this? > > I'd be in,

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

On Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2016 22:59:36 CET Stephen Kelly wrote: > On 02/15/2016 07:24 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > Hi Dominik, > > > > Am 15.02.2016 19:01 schrieb "Dominik Haumann" > > > >: > > > 1. Wouldn't it make sense you have a developer sprint

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

On 02/15/2016 07:24 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > Hi Dominik, > > Am 15.02.2016 19:01 schrieb "Dominik Haumann" >: > > 1. Wouldn't it make sense you have a developer sprint ASAP for this? > > I'd be in, but I do not have the time to organize one. I could

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

Hi Dominik, Am 15.02.2016 19:01 schrieb "Dominik Haumann" : > 1. Wouldn't it make sense you have a developer sprint ASAP for this? I'd be in, but I do not have the time to organize one. I could probably get a room in our office though (in Berlin). > 2. Reading about this

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

Brad King wrote: > I think the responses in this thread have indicated there is interest > in working toward the full daemon approach. Perhaps discussion should > now proceed on the daemon protocol design over in the thread Tobias > started on cmake-developers: > > cmake daemon mode protocol >

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

Hello Stephen, thanks again for your work and interest in IDE integration! I read Bard's reply as meaning that your cleanup work is a great benefit to cmake, but will probably not be available in the foreseeable future (if at all). Alexander goes back to the generator approach we discussed a

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 10:05:08 Brad King wrote: > On 01/12/2016 05:15 AM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > I read Brad's reply as meaning that your cleanup work is a great > > benefit to cmake, but will probably not be available in the > > foreseeable future (if at all). > > Most of Stephen's work

Re: [cmake-developers] [Qt-creator] CMake daemon for user tools

Brad King wrote: >> Alexander goes back to the generator approach we discussed a year ago >> and explicitly says he won't work on that, so nothing will happen >> there. > > The generate-json-description approach remains a valid alternative. > Aleix's work on it got pretty far before Stephen