On 10/11/14 16:49, Brad King wrote:
> Thanks. Please rename the 'foo' and 'bar' libs to 'case5Foo' and
> 'case5Bar' to avoid conflict with other cases in the future.
Done:
Rename the 'foo' and 'bar' libs to 'case5Foo' and 'case5Bar'
http://www.cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=commitdiff;
On 10/11/14 15:18, Brad King wrote:
> However, the test does not fail for me even without the fix. I
> think for 3.1.0-rc2 I will take this fix but not the test yet.
> Please extend the topic to revise the test:
The test fails for me on a ubuntu precise chroot using gcc 4.6.3 (I
wasn't able to r
On 11/10/2014 10:46 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
>> - See if it can be integrated into the Tests/Dependency test,
>> perhaps as a new Case5 directory.
>
> Done, see:
>
> Convert the test to use C only and move it into Tests/Dependency/Case5
> http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commit
On 11/09/2014 12:05 PM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
> Fix regression in link order introduced by the link-line-dedup topic
Thanks. I revised the implementation slightly to avoid prepending
to a vector on every iteration. I've merged to 'next' for testing:
Fix link line order when shared lib
Hello,
Please review topic fix_link-line-dedup_regression:
Fix regression in link order introduced by the link-line-dedup topic
Some compilers will fail linking if an executable is linking to a
library that is not used and a static library that uses the shared one.
This patch reverse the direc
