Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-03-21 Thread Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP > Cc: CMake Developers > Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review > > Simple question : do you think that this would be useable in order to have a > single build pipeline based on CMake for a Unity3D project that also requires > some native C+

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-03-21 Thread Jean-Michaƫl Celerier
;> Cc: Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP; CMake Developers >> Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review >> >> Seems to me like C# support should work just fine with other generators: >> ninja, nmake, and UNIX Makefiles included. Especially with mono on >>

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-03-21 Thread Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
ct: Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review > > Seems to me like C# support should work just fine with other generators: > ninja, nmake, and UNIX Makefiles included. Especially with mono on > Linux/Mac. > > > David > > > On Mar 7, 2016, at 2:12 PM, B

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-03-21 Thread Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
ubject: Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review > > On 02/25/2016 05:51 AM, Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP wrote: > > The part that probably needs most additional work is all the C# > > detection and configuration part in the module scripts. > > In your branch Modules/CM

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-03-07 Thread David Cole via cmake-developers
Seems to me like C# support should work just fine with other generators: ninja, nmake, and UNIX Makefiles included. Especially with mono on Linux/Mac. David > On Mar 7, 2016, at 2:12 PM, Brad King wrote: > >> On 02/25/2016 05:51 AM, Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP wrote: >> The part that proba

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-03-07 Thread Brad King
On 02/25/2016 05:51 AM, Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP wrote: > The part that probably needs most additional work is all the > C# detection and configuration part in the module scripts. In your branch Modules/CMakeDetermineCSharpCompiler.cmake currently has a lot of logic and environment checks fo

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-03-01 Thread Robert Goulet
ake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] > On Behalf Of Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:52 AM > To: Gilles Khouzam ; CMake Developers > > Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review > > Hi Gilles, > > good to hear C# suppo

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-03-01 Thread Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
. > > Good job! > > -Original Message- > From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] > On Behalf Of Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:52 AM > To: Gilles Khouzam ; CMake Developers > > Subject: Re: [cmake

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-02-29 Thread Robert Goulet
Good job! -Original Message- From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:52 AM To: Gilles Khouzam ; CMake Developers Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review Hi Gilles, good

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-02-25 Thread Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
d out of place as well as a comment change going from 14 to 12 where 14 was accurate. I'll try to play with this next week and get projects running on it. ~Gilles From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP Sent: Wednesday, Febr

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-02-25 Thread Gilles Khouzam
to play with this next week and get projects running on it. ~Gilles From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 06:03 To: CMake Developers mailto:cmake-developers@cmake.org>> Subject: [cmake

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-02-24 Thread Gilles Khouzam
play with this next week and get projects running on it. ~Gilles From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 06:03 To: CMake Developers mailto:cmake-developers@cmake.org>> Subject: [cmake-develo

[cmake-developers] C# support ready for review (update)

2016-02-18 Thread Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
ch I need for local building and usage. best regards, Michael From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:03 PM To: CMake Developers Subject: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review Nati

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-02-18 Thread Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
e.org] On Behalf Of Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 06:03 To: CMake Developers mailto:cmake-developers@cmake.org>> Subject: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review Native C# support is ready for review. I split the patch in two parts: part 1: Some

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-02-17 Thread Gilles Khouzam
ry to play with this next week and get projects running on it. ~Gilles From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 06:03 To: CMake Developers Subject: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

[cmake-developers] C# support ready for review

2016-02-10 Thread Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
Native C# support is ready for review. I split the patch in two parts: part 1: Some preparational stuff that does not really change or enable anything. Documentation and Test files as well as the required CMake module is added. The changes to existing code are small, only few methods in existin