Re: [cmake-developers] C++11 all features available?

2017-08-23 Thread Brad King
On 08/23/2017 05:15 AM, Craig Scott wrote: > how long until we up the minimum Visual Studio version from 2010 > to at least 2013? That's only blocked on me finding time to update the nightly testing infrastructure. It requires moving several builds to other machines. -Brad -- Powered by www.ki

Re: [cmake-developers] C++11 all features available?

2017-08-23 Thread Craig Scott
Probably just asking what a number of people are now thinking, but if we're now requiring C++11 to build CMake, how long until we up the minimum Visual Studio version from 2010 to at least 2013? Seems a bit optimistic to still be trying to support 2010 as the minimum standard and also state C++11 a

Re: [cmake-developers] C++11 all features available?

2017-08-23 Thread Sebastian Holtermann
> > > > it looks like C++11 is now a requirement for CMake itself. > > > > > > Yes. We just merged this: > > > https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/1132 > > > > > > but you beat us to the announcement. > > > > I saw the MR last week and was delighted. The iterator type naming

Re: [cmake-developers] C++11 all features available?

2017-08-22 Thread Daniel Pfeifer
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: > Am Montag, 21. August 2017, 10:04:28 CEST schrieben Sie: > > On 08/21/2017 09:53 AM, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: > > > it looks like C++11 is now a requirement for CMake itself. > > > > Yes. We just merged this: > > > > https://git

Re: [cmake-developers] C++11 all features available?

2017-08-21 Thread Jean-Michaël Celerier
> Thread support would be nice because Autogen could be parallelized perfectly. oh please yes. moc generation is almost 10% of my build time. --- Jean-Michaël Celerier http://www.jcelerier.name On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: > Am Montag, 21. August 2017, 10:

Re: [cmake-developers] C++11 all features available?

2017-08-21 Thread Sebastian Holtermann
Am Montag, 21. August 2017, 10:12:26 CEST schrieb Ben Boeckel: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 15:53:11 +0200, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: > > - std::array > > I don't see why not. > > > - std::basic_regex (and friends) > > Note that we require backwards compat with the old regex engine, so this > o

Re: [cmake-developers] C++11 all features available?

2017-08-21 Thread Sebastian Holtermann
Am Montag, 21. August 2017, 10:04:28 CEST schrieben Sie: > On 08/21/2017 09:53 AM, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: > > it looks like C++11 is now a requirement for CMake itself. > > Yes. We just merged this: > > https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/1132 > > but you beat us to the

Re: [cmake-developers] C++11 all features available?

2017-08-21 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 15:53:11 +0200, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: > - std::array I don't see why not. > - std::basic_regex (and friends) Note that we require backwards compat with the old regex engine, so this one needs to be used carefully and only on internal uses. > - std::thread (and f

Re: [cmake-developers] C++11 all features available?

2017-08-21 Thread Brad King
On 08/21/2017 09:53 AM, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: > it looks like C++11 is now a requirement for CMake itself. Yes. We just merged this: https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/1132 but you beat us to the announcement. > But does this mean *all* the nice features from the std

[cmake-developers] C++11 all features available?

2017-08-21 Thread Sebastian Holtermann
Hi, it looks like C++11 is now a requirement for CMake itself. That's good news. But does this mean *all* the nice features from the std library can be used? I'm especially interested in - std::array - std::basic_regex (and friends) - std::thread (and friends) - std::atomic_flag -Sebastian