On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
The first step would be to update the patch against current master
> and verify that all CPack* tests are ok.
>
> > Maybe you can push the code in a branch on cmake stage and try to get it
> > accepted into master ?
>
> That would be the best ap
2013/10/11 Alexander Neundorf :
> On Friday 11 October 2013, you wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>> > The thread looks somewhat unfinished, and Ralf simply didn't seem to
>> > reply anymore, it would have needed just some more pushing to get it in.
>>
>> What ki
On Friday 11 October 2013, you wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > The thread looks somewhat unfinished, and Ralf simply didn't seem to
> > reply anymore, it would have needed just some more pushing to get it in.
>
> What kind of pushing? Code polishing? Documen
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> The thread looks somewhat unfinished, and Ralf simply didn't seem to reply
> anymore, it would have needed just some more pushing to get it in.
>
>
What kind of pushing? Code polishing? Documentation? Tests?
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
htt
On Thursday 10 October 2013, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few years ago, Ralf Habacker proposed and implemented a 7-zip generator
> for CPack:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=cmake&m=124031321521852&w=2
>
> Despite positive review from Alexander Neundorf, it seems it was not
> included. Was
Hello,
A few years ago, Ralf Habacker proposed and implemented a 7-zip generator
for CPack:
http://marc.info/?l=cmake&m=124031321521852&w=2
Despite positive review from Alexander Neundorf, it seems it was not
included. Was there any reason for that?
In a project I'm working on currently, 7-zip
