On 10/04/2013 05:46 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
This is the test that is failing, according to my knowledge of C it
should build, even with very old compilers...
The problem is the empty struct:
struct struct_with_non_existent_members {
};
Some C compilers reject that. You'll have
On 10/02/2013 07:14 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
On 25/09/13 18:49, Brad King wrote:
On 09/25/2013 12:16 PM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
I updated the CheckStructHasMember_CXX topic.
That looks good, though I haven't tested it by hand myself.
While at this, please look at adding
On 02/10/13 16:23, Brad King wrote:
You could also add a RunCMake/CheckModules case to check the
error conditions (bad args and bad language).
Done!
Cheers,
Daniele
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
On 23/09/13 17:50, Brad King wrote:
One could add an optional extra parameter to specify the language
to be used for the check (C or CXX). However, we should do something
that could be re-used in the similar modules too. Would you mind
surveying all the check signatures we currently have and
On 09/24/2013 03:50 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
It looks like that the signatures are not very consistent...
Yes, but they all have room for optional keyword-based arguments
following the main arguments. How about
CHECK_STRUCT_HAS_MEMBER (struct member header variable
On 24/09/13 14:18, Brad King wrote:
On 09/24/2013 03:50 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
It looks like that the signatures are not very consistent...
Yes, but they all have room for optional keyword-based arguments
following the main arguments. How about
CHECK_STRUCT_HAS_MEMBER
On 09/24/2013 09:46 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
Any convention works for me... Perhaps also the other Check module
should follow the same convention, though.
If anyone wants to take this action then go for it. I wouldn't consider
it a high priority though.
I pushed a commit to the
On 24/09/13 16:44, Brad King wrote:
On 09/24/2013 09:46 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
I pushed a commit to the CheckStructHasMember_CXX topic, can you review
it?
You can simplify the implementation using ${ARGN} to get the arguments
beyond those explicitly named in the signature.
You
Hello,
CheckStructHasMember does not support C++ only structs. If headers
required to check if a struct has a member can be compiled with C++
compiler only, the check will fail, because the C compiler will fail. As
a consequence, the result variable is set to false, even if the struct
has that
Sorry disregard my previous mail...
My problem was actually different and the attached patch didn't work...
Regards,
Daniele
On 23/09/13 10:27, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
Hello,
CheckStructHasMember does not support C++ only structs. If headers
required to check if a struct has a
On 09/23/2013 04:27 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
The attached patch adds 2 new macros:
- CHECK_CXX_STRUCT_HAS_MEMBER (similar to CHECK_STRUCT_HAS_MEMBER but
uses the C++ compiler)
- CHECK_C_STRUCT_HAS_MEMBER (identical to CHECK_STRUCT_HAS_MEMBER,
added for symmetry)
that can be used
11 matches
Mail list logo
