On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 23:47:15 +0100, Roman Wüger wrote:
> I think the change is also required for the following line (line 424):
>
>
>
> if(!default_config && !configurationTypes.empty())
>
>
>
> Because here the ?default_config? could also be a valid pointer with an
> empty content/stri
Hello Ben,
I think the change is also required for the following line (line 424):
if(!default_config && !configurationTypes.empty())
Because here the default_config could also be a valid pointer with an
empty content/string.
Nevertheless I had already posted a working patch which use
