>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Brad King wrote:
> > On 08/07/2015 05:25 AM, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> >> CMake needs to be able to identify MSYS2 distinctly from both MINGW and
> MSYS
> >> first. Would a patch making that distinction be acceptable to CMake?
> > Yes, I think that makes sense sinc
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Brad King wrote:
> On 08/07/2015 08:33 AM, Ray Donnelly wrote:
>> Finally, there's the consideration as to whether "MSYS2" implies you
>> are using just the minimum amount of the MSYS2 shell or whether you've
>> gone all-in with MSYS2
>
> CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME should re
On 08/07/2015 08:33 AM, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> Finally, there's the consideration as to whether "MSYS2" implies you
> are using just the minimum amount of the MSYS2 shell or whether you've
> gone all-in with MSYS2
CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME should refer to the target application environment.
If you're build
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Brad King wrote:
> On 08/07/2015 05:25 AM, Ray Donnelly wrote:
>> CMake needs to be able to identify MSYS2 distinctly from both MINGW and MSYS
>> first. Would a patch making that distinction be acceptable to CMake?
>
> Yes, I think that makes sense since the MSYS2
On 08/07/2015 05:25 AM, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> CMake needs to be able to identify MSYS2 distinctly from both MINGW and MSYS
> first. Would a patch making that distinction be acceptable to CMake?
Yes, I think that makes sense since the MSYS2 environment is distinct
from Windows, MinGW, MSYS, and Cy
