Sorry for creating a new thread, I do not know how to respond to a previous
thread as a new member.
Is there any progress on the xcode schemes?
If not, I’ll give it a try and change cmXCodeScheme.cxx according to
https://cmake.org/get-involved
I’m especially interested in changing the “Executabl
Hi Gregor,
I know you are probably busy with other things, but do you see
anything in the discussion so far that should prevent an
implementation attempt? I don't have a whole lot of time available to
work on this either, so progress will probably be slow with me
squeezing in work here and there,
After spending some time trying to figure out how to affect the build
"destination", it seems that destinations associated with a given
scheme are not influenced by anything beyond the targets referenced as
build targets for the scheme. In other words, if a scheme builds an
iOS target, then the i
Thanks for the followup Gregor.
One thing that concerns me about the property-centric approach is that
I can't think of a way to use properties for generating a custom
scheme that builds the ALL_BUILD target. I would assume this would
run into the same issues and limitations that I have seen in g
Hello Steven,
On 9/22/17 3:36 AM, Steven Velez wrote:
> # Property-Centric
> In this proposal, the generation of the scheme files is customized primarily
> by
> a user setting additional, specialized properties on a given target, which
> then
> affect the generation of the scheme files associate
Hi guys,
Any thoughts on this?
TL;DR Version:
We can add some target properties that the Xcode generator uses to
customize schemes:
* XCODE_SCHEME_NAME
* XCODE_SCHEME_LAUNCH_OPTS
* XCODE_SCHEME_LAUNCH_ADTL_OPTS
* XCODE_SCHEME_LAUNCH_RUNNABLE
* XCODE_SCHEME_LAUNCH_ARGUMENTS
* XCODE_SCHEME_LAUNCH
Hello Again,
Sorry for the delay. After some consideration and investigation, I have the
following two proposals:
# Property-Centric
In this proposal, the generation of the scheme files is customized primarily by
a user setting additional, specialized properties on a given target, which then
aff
Sure.. but I haven't even thought about it much yet. So when that has
happened, I'll make a more formal proposal.
Thanks,
Steven
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Brad King wrote:
> On 09/15/2017 10:55 AM, Steven Velez wrote:
> > I am assuming that the lack of response indicates that there has
On 09/15/2017 10:55 AM, Steven Velez wrote:
> I am assuming that the lack of response indicates that there has not
> been much thought or interest expressed along this dimension of the feature.
>
> Would a better way to approach this be to implement a prototype and create a
> WIP MR?
Can you pos
Hello,
I am assuming that the lack of response indicates that there has not been
much thought or interest expressed along this dimension of the feature.
Would a better way to approach this be to implement a prototype and create
a WIP MR?
Thanks,
Steven
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Steven V
Hello All,
I recently noticed that 3.9.1 added the ability for the XCode generator to
also generate scheme files. This is great as we have been post processing
generator output to add schemes according to our standards, but are
discovering various issues with this approach.
However, the current
11 matches
Mail list logo