On 02/27/2014 11:20 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Why do we have to distinguish them? I'm trying to not distinguish them.
I meant to distinguish the existing concepts in this discussion.
>> Hmm, that is true for VS < 10 also. All those generators still
>> have their own loops to classify sources.
Brad King wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 03:32 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> IDE generators are problematic though.
>>
>> 'git grep GetExternalObjects' shows that the IDEs mostly don't call
>> GetExternalObjects at all.
>
> In this discussion we must distinguish "external objects" that are
> explicit .o f
On 02/27/2014 03:32 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> IDE generators are problematic though.
>
> 'git grep GetExternalObjects' shows that the IDEs mostly don't call
> GetExternalObjects at all.
In this discussion we must distinguish "external objects" that are
explicit .o files mentioned in the list o
Hi,
Part of the work on the SOURCES genex feature is that I want to have uniform
handling of it.
So
add_library(ObjLib OBJECT a.cpp b.cpp)
add_executable(exec c.cpp d.o e.cpp $ f.cpp)
file(GENERATE OUTPUT exec_files CONTENT $)
will result in a file containing
c.cpp
d.o
e.cpp
a.o
b.o
