Hi Ben.
2016-01-04 17:39 GMT+01:00 Ben Boeckel :
> The
> big remaining problem is passing char* as an argument where functions do
> std::string(arg) right away. I fixed all of those which did explicit
> std::string conversions (via assignment or otherwise), but those
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:18:49 +0100, Bartosz Kosiorek wrote:
> That's great news.
> What is the branch name/link to these improvement?
> Is it possible to push these improvements partially?
Because the changes are so pervasive, I'd like for the branch to be
bisectable, so every commit should
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Bartosz Kosiorek wrote:
>
> Hi Ben.
>
> 2016-01-04 17:39 GMT+01:00 Ben Boeckel :
>>
>> The
>> big remaining problem is passing char* as an argument where functions do
>> std::string(arg) right away. I fixed all of
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Pfeifer
wrote:
>
> Generators for Xcode and Visual Studio have to generate more files.
>
... and they have to process all configurations (Debug, Release,
MinSizeRel, RelWithDbgInfo) during the generation stage, instead of just
one
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 22:04:14 +0100, Dimitar Yordanov wrote:
> I agree with you. Running valgrind directly on the cmake binary
> provides useful information: I can see which internal cmake functions
> are used the most and consume most of the time.
>
> Nevertheless, I think it would be useful
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 18:40:27 Dimitar Yordanov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was searching for a way to profile CMake scripts in order to find
> bottlenecks and possibilities to improve performance. I found out that
> someone already invested time on that [1] providing a minimal
solution. The
>
Hi all,
I was searching for a way to profile CMake scripts in order to find
bottlenecks and possibilities to improve performance. I found out that
someone already invested time on that [1] providing a minimal solution. The
idea behind it is to use the cmake "--trace" option and to output a time
2015-12-27 21:05 GMT+01:00 Alexander Neundorf :
>
> On Sunday, December 27, 2015 18:40:27 Dimitar Yordanov wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
> >
>
> > I was searching for a way to profile CMake scripts in order to find
>
> > bottlenecks and possibilities to improve performance. I found out