Alex, Is this change in the code that expands PACKAGE_INCLUDE_DIRS reasonable?
https://github.com/dlrdave/CMake/commit/0a45e23987e4afdc40859b54b0905c3d7c5b91eb#diff-14 Using them directly in the --find-package case rather than going through the local generator (which conditionally adds source and binary directories, and implicit include directories) would seem to make sense to me in this case, but I'm not 100% sure of whether this will break any of the scenarios. Do you know if anybody is depending on the extra directories that local generator *may* add, or should PACKAGE_INCLUDE_DIRS be sufficient? Thanks, David -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
